Fatal ischemic stroke related to nonpermissive peripheral artery access for percutaneous aortic valve replacement

被引:28
作者
Berry, Colin
Cartier, Raymond
Bonan, Raoul
机构
[1] Montreal Heart Inst, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
[2] Montreal Heart Inst, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
关键词
aortic valve replacement; percutaneous coronary intervention; valve disease; peripheral vascular disease;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.20958
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This report describes an 85 year-old man who underwent percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR). With a logistic euroSCORE of 37%, the patient had been refused surgical aortic valve replacement because of an unacceptably high peri-operative risk. During the PAVR procedure, severe resistance was encountered when advancing the 21 Fr delivery catheter through the left iliac artery despite pre-dilatation with a 7 mm balloon. Following this, PAVR was promptly achieved without difficulty, with excellent valve positioning, no peri-valvular leak and good hemodynamics. However, transesophageal echocardiography revealed a mobile echogenic mass within the outflow tract of the left ventricle. The mass was retrieved with a cardiac bioptome manipulated via the left femoral artery through a 9 Fir sheath. A right cerebral ischemic stroke manifested shortly after the post-procedure and the patient died on the fourth post-operative day. Post-mortem findings revealed a left subclavian artery occlusion by iliac vascular tissue. This report highlights the imperative for device-specific vascular access screening criteria and the need to minimize device size in order to safely accomplish PAVR. (C)2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Berry Colin, 2006, EuroIntervention, V2, P257
[2]   Prognostic significance of newly acquired bundle branch block after aortic valve replacement [J].
El-Khally, Z ;
Thibault, B ;
Staniloae, C ;
Theroux, P ;
Dubuc, M ;
Roy, D ;
Guerra, P ;
Macle, L ;
Talajic, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (08) :1008-1011
[3]   Does the type of prosthesis influence the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation following isolated aortic valve replacement [J].
Elahi, MM ;
Osman, KA ;
Bhandari, M ;
Dhannapuneni, RRV .
HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2005, 8 (06) :E396-E400
[4]   Risk factors for requirement of permanent pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement [J].
Erdogan, HB ;
Kayalar, N ;
Ardal, H ;
Omeroglu, SN ;
Kirali, K ;
Guler, M ;
Akinci, E ;
Yakut, C .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2006, 21 (03) :211-215
[5]  
Grube E, 2005, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V45, p358A
[6]   First report on a human percutaneous transluminal implantation of a self-expanding valve prosthesis for interventional treatment of aortic valve [J].
Grube, E ;
Laborde, JC ;
Zickmann, B ;
Gerckens, U ;
Felderhoff, T ;
Sauren, B ;
Bootsveld, A ;
Buellesfeld, L ;
Iversen, S .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 66 (04) :465-469
[7]  
Habicht JM, 2000, J HEART VALVE DIS, V9, P629
[8]   Aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians: perioperative outcome and clinical follow-up [J].
Kolh, P ;
Lahaye, L ;
Gerard, P ;
Limet, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 16 (01) :68-73
[9]  
Laborde JC, 2006, TRANSCATHETER VALVE, P175
[10]  
LAMARCHE Y, IN PRESS ANN THORAC