A Dual System Model of Preferences Under Risk

被引:125
作者
Mukherjee, Kanchan [1 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Ctr Decis Making & Risk Anal, 1 Ayer Rajah Ave, Singapore 138676, Singapore
关键词
dual process systems; preferences; risk; choice; uncertainty; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXPECTED UTILITY; PROSPECT-THEORY; SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY; AFFECTIVE PSYCHOLOGY; DECISION-MAKING; UNCERTAINTY; AMBIGUITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0017884
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article presents a dual system model (DSM) of decision making under risk and uncertainty according to which the value of a gamble is a combination of the values assigned to it independently by the affective and deliberative systems. On the basis of research on dual process theories and empirical research in Hsee and Rottenstreich (2004) and Rottenstreich and Hsee (2001) among others, the DSM incorporates (a) individual differences in disposition to rational versus emotional decision making, (b) the affective nature of outcomes, and (c) different task construals within its framework. The model has good descriptive validity and accounts for (a) violation of nontransparent stochastic dominance, (b) fourfold pattern of risk attitudes, (c) ambiguity aversion, (d) common consequence effect, (e) common ratio effect, (f) isolation effect, and (g) coalescing and event-splitting effects. The DSM is also used to make several novel predictions of conditions under which specific behavior patterns may or may not occur.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 255
页数:13
相关论文
共 103 条
[91]   Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems [J].
Smith, ER ;
DeCoster, J .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2000, 4 (02) :108-131
[92]  
Smith SM, 1996, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V9, P283, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199612)9:4<283::AID-BDM241>3.0.CO
[93]  
2-7
[94]   Individual differences in rational thought [J].
Stanovich, KE ;
West, RF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (02) :161-188
[95]   Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? [J].
Stanovich, KE ;
West, RF .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (05) :645-+
[96]   TESTING FOR JUXTAPOSITION AND EVENT-SPLITTING EFFECTS [J].
STARMER, C ;
SUGDEN, R .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1993, 6 (03) :235-254
[97]   AN ECONOMIC-THEORY OF SELF-CONTROL [J].
THALER, RH ;
SHEFRIN, HM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1981, 89 (02) :392-406
[98]  
Torrance G W, 1989, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V5, P559
[99]   ADVANCES IN PROSPECT-THEORY - CUMULATIVE REPRESENTATION OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :297-323
[100]   RATIONAL CHOICE AND THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (04) :S251-S278