Inaccessible novel questionnaires in published medical research: Hidden methods, hidden costs

被引:19
作者
Schilling, Lisa M.
Kozak, Katarzyna
Lundahl, Kristy
Dellavalle, Robert P.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver & Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Denver & Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[4] Dept Dermatol, Dept Vet Affairs, Denver, CO USA
关键词
data collection; methods; peer review; questionnaires; research design;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwj349
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although critical analysis of survey research is limited when reviewers and readers cannot view a study's questionnaire, access to novel questionnaires used in published research has not been systematically examined. The authors identified publications reporting the results of novel questionnaires in three medical journals (JAMA, The New England Journal of Medicine, and The Lancet) in January 2000-May 2003 and searched portable document format (PDF) versions of the studies for the complete questionnaire or a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) providing access to the questionnaire. When the questionnaire was not provided in the publication or a published URL, the authors requested it from the corresponding author in writing up to three times over a 6-week period. Of 93 publications with novel questionnaires, four printed the questionnaire in the article and three provided online access. Corresponding authors failed to provide questionnaires for 37 of 81 (46%) studies. Novel questionnaires used in published research are frequently not available to readers or researchers. Policies that improve access to novel questionnaires will allow better assessment of study results, reduce duplicated efforts, and improve authorship attribution for questionnaire design.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1144
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Hands-on guide to questionnaire research - Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire [J].
Boynton, PM ;
Greenhalgh, T .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7451) :1312-1315
[2]   Google makes data free for all [J].
Butler, D .
NATURE, 2005, 438 (7067) :400-401
[3]   Epidemiology deserves better questionnaires [J].
Gallacher, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (04) :804-804
[4]   THE PRETEST IN SURVEY-RESEARCH - ISSUES AND PRELIMINARY FINDINGS [J].
HUNT, SD ;
SPARKMAN, RD ;
WILCOX, JB .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1982, 19 (02) :269-273
[5]   Scientists behaving badly [J].
Martinson, BC ;
Anderson, MS ;
de Vries, R .
NATURE, 2005, 435 (7043) :737-738
[6]   Epidemiology deserves better questionnaires [J].
Olsen, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (06) :935-935
[7]   Public access to NIH-funded research [J].
Steinbrook, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (17) :1739-1741
[8]   The quest for better questionnaires [J].
Wilcox, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 150 (12) :1261-1262