Factors influencing short-term and long-term pediatric renal transplant survival

被引:46
作者
Schurman, SJ
McEnery, P
机构
[1] CHILDRENS HOSP, MED CTR, DEPT PEDIAT, DIV NEPHROL, CINCINNATI, OH 45229 USA
[2] UNIV S FLORIDA, COLL MED, DIV NEPHROL, DEPT PEDIAT, TAMPA, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70210-5
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the patient and donor characteristics important for short-term and long-term renal transplant survival at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Methods: Cumulative transplant survival was calculated and univariate analysis of graft survival performed on 206 transplants done since 1970 in 148 pediatric patients. Grafts to black recipients were analyzed separately. Short-term graft survival is defined as 1-year allograft survival and long-term graft survival as graft half-life (t(1/2)) survival for allografts functioning after the first posttransplant year. Results: One-year graft survival of living-related donor (LRD) and cadaver donor (CAD) transplants was 77% and 62%, respectively. Graft t(1/2) was 11.2 years for LRD and 9.8 years for CAD grafts. The CAD 1-year graft survival when the recipient or donor was younger than 7 years was 36% and 41%, respectively. The LRD 1-year graft survival to children younger than 7 years was 88% versus 75% in older children. Graft survival at 1 year was similar for CAD primary and retransplants (60% vs 65%), but graft t(1/2) better for CAD primary grafts (17.8 years vs 5.0 years, p <0.001). Preemptive LRD grafts performed similarly at 1 year and better over the long term compared with patients who had long-term dialysis (85% vs 74%, p = NS; and 16.9 years vs 8.0 years, p <0.001), Preemptive CAD grafts did poorly, with 1-year graft survival of 38%. Administration of Cyclosporine A (CsA) improved CAD 1-year graft survival (76% vs 54%, p <0.001) but not long-term survival. Thirty grafts to 24 black children had a 1-year survival of 48%, with no graft surviving more than 5 years. Conclusions: Living-related donor transplantation should be aggressively pursued for young children. If a LRD is unavailable and the young child's medical condition is stable, delay in CAD transplantation should be considered, with dialysis before transplant. Use of CsA improves 1-year pediatric graft survival, but does not improve graft survival after 1 year at the Children's Hospital Medical Center. New strategies to improve graft survival in black children should be pursued.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 462
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Journal of Chronic Disease
[2]   SURVIVAL OF CADAVERIC RENAL-TRANSPLANT GRAFTS FROM YOUNG DONORS AND IN YOUNG RECIPIENTS [J].
ARBUS, GS ;
ROCHON, J ;
THOMPSON, D .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) :152-157
[3]   OUTCOME OF RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDREN LESS THAN 2 YEARS OF AGE [J].
BRISCOE, DM ;
KIM, MS ;
LILLEHEI, C ;
ERAKLIS, AJ ;
LEVEY, RH ;
HARMON, WE .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 42 (03) :657-662
[4]   RACIAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE SURVIVAL OF CADAVERIC RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS - OVERRIDING EFFECTS OF HLA MATCHING AND SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS [J].
BUTKUS, DE ;
MEYDRECH, EF ;
RAJU, SS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (12) :840-845
[5]  
Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group, 1986, N Engl J Med, V314, P1219
[6]  
DAVIS ID, 1990, PEDIATRICS, V86, P594
[7]   IMPACT OF RACE ON RENAL-TRANSPLANT OUTCOME [J].
DAWIDSON, IJA ;
COORPENDER, L ;
FISHER, D ;
HELDERMAN, H ;
HULL, A ;
PALMER, B ;
PETERS, P ;
SAGALOWSKY, A ;
SANDOR, ZF ;
TOTO, R ;
REISCH, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1990, 49 (01) :63-67
[8]  
DUNN J, 1989, TRANSPLANT P, V21, P3946
[9]   THE PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGISTS DILEMMA - GROWTH AFTER RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION AND ITS INTERACTION WITH AGE AS A POSSIBLE IMMUNOLOGICAL VARIABLE [J].
ETTENGER, RB ;
BLIFELD, C ;
PRINCE, H ;
GRADUS, DBE ;
CHO, S ;
SEKIYA, N ;
SALUSKY, IB ;
FINE, RN .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1987, 111 (06) :1022-1025
[10]   IMPROVED CADAVERIC RENAL-TRANSPLANT OUTCOME IN CHILDREN [J].
ETTENGER, RB ;
ROSENTHAL, JT ;
MARIK, JL ;
MALEKZADEH, M ;
FORSYTHE, SB ;
KAMIL, ES ;
SALUSKY, IB ;
FINE, RN .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) :137-142