Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography

被引:27
作者
Gijbels, F
Sanderink, G
Wyatt, J
Van Dam, J
Nowak, B
Jacobs, R
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Sch Dent Oral Pathol & Maxillofacial Surg, Oral Imaging Ctr, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Oral Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Radiotherapy, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4811532
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study was to measure organ doses and calculate the effective dose for indirect and direct digital cephalometric exposures. Material and methods Indirect digital cephalometric exposures were made of a Rando(R) phantom head using a Cranex Tome(R) multipurpose unit with storage phosphor plates from Agfa and the direct digital ( Charge Coupled Device, CCD) exposures were made with a Proline Ceph CM(R) unit. Exposure settings were 70 kV and 4 mAs for indirect digital exposures. Direct digital exposures were made with 70 kV, 10 mA and a total scanning time of 23 s. TLD700(R) dosemeters were used to measure organ doses, and the effective doses were calculated with ( effective dosesal) and without inclusion of the salivary glands. A pilot study was carried out to compare diagnostic image quality of both imaging modalities. Results Effective doses were 1.7 muSv for direct digital and 1.6 muSv for indirect digital cephalometric imaging. When salivary glands were included in the calculation, effective doses(sa)/ were 3.4 muSv and 2.2 muSv respectively. Organ doses were higher for direct digital imaging, except for the thyroid gland, where the organ doses were comparable. Diagnostic image quality of indirect and direct digital cephalometric images seemed comparable. Conclusion Effective dose and effective dosesal were higher for direct digital cephalometric exposure compared with indirect digital exposure. Organ doses were higher for direct digital cephalography. From preliminary data, it may be presumed that diagnostic image quality of indirect and direct digital cephalometric images are comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 152
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANN ICRP
[2]   The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography [J].
Brettle, DS ;
Workman, A ;
Ellwood, RP ;
Launders, JH ;
Horner, K ;
Davies, RM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (819) :256-261
[3]   Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality [J].
Dannewitz, B ;
Hassfeld, S ;
Eickholz, P ;
Mühling, J .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :50-55
[4]   Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography [J].
Dula, K ;
Sanderink, G ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Mini, R ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1998, 86 (02) :227-233
[5]   Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure [J].
Farman, TT ;
Farman, AG ;
Kelly, MS ;
Firriolo, FJ ;
Yancey, JM ;
Stewart, AV .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (01) :36-40
[6]   Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures [J].
Gijbels, F ;
Sanderink, G ;
Wyatt, J ;
Van Dam, J ;
Nowak, B ;
Jacobs, R .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (02) :128-133
[7]   Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study [J].
Gijbels, F ;
Serhal, CB ;
Willems, G ;
Bosmans, H ;
Sanderink, G ;
Persoons, M ;
Jacobs, R .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (02) :101-105
[8]   DOSIMETRY OF ABSORBED RADIATION IN RADIOGRAPHIC CEPHALOMETRY [J].
GILDA, JE ;
MAILLIE, HD .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1992, 73 (05) :638-643
[9]   ABSORBED DOSES WITH INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY - FUNCTION OF VARIOUS TECHNICAL PARAMETERS [J].
HAYAKAWA, Y ;
FUJIMORI, H ;
KUROYANAGI, K .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1993, 76 (04) :519-524
[10]   Environmental factors and the risk of salivary gland cancer [J].
HornRoss, PL ;
Ljung, BM ;
Morrow, M .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (04) :414-419