Perfusion Scintigraphy Versus 256-Slice CT Angiography in Pregnant Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison of Radiation Risks

被引:40
作者
Perisinakis, Kostas [1 ]
Seimenis, Ioannis [2 ,3 ]
Tzedakis, Antonis [4 ]
Damilakis, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Crete, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
[2] Med Diagnost Ctr Ayios Therissos, Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Democritus Univ Thrace, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece
[4] Univ Hosp Heraklion, Dept Med Phys, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
关键词
CT pulmonary angiography; lung perfusion scintigraphy; pulmonary embolism; patient dose; radiation risk; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; DOSE REDUCTION;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.114.137968
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
One aim of the current study was to determine normalized dose data for maternal radiosensitive organs and embryo/fetus from 256-slice CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) performed on pregnant patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. A second aim was to provide reliable maternal and fetal doses and associated radiation cancer risk estimates from 256-slice CTPA and lung perfusion scintigraphy (LPS) for comparison. Methods: Mathematic anthropomorphic phantoms were generated to simulate the average woman at early pregnancy and at the third, sixth, and ninth months of gestation. In each phantom, 0-3 additional 1.5-cm-thick fat tissue layers were added to derive 4 phantoms representing pregnant women with different body sizes. Monte Carlo methods were used to simulate low-dose 256-slice CTPA exposures on each of the 16 generated phantoms. Normalized organ and embryo/fetal dose data were derived for exposures at 80, 100, and 120 kV. Maternal effective dose and embryo/fetal dose from 256-slice CTPA and associated lifetime attributable risks of radiation cancer were determined for different body sizes and gestational stages and compared with corresponding data from LPS. Results: For an average-sized pregnant patient at the first trimester, the 256-slice CTPA exposure resulted in a maternal effective dose of 1 mSv and an embryo/fetal dose of 0.05 mGy. However, maternal effective dose considerably increased with body size, whereas embryo/fetal dose increased with both body size and gestational stage. Compared with LPS, low-dose CTPA to an average-sized pregnant patient resulted in a 30% higher maternal effective dose but a 3.4-6 times lower embryo/fetal dose. Nevertheless, LPS was associated with less aggregated radiation risk for an average-sized pregnant patient, with the difference from CTPA being increased further for larger patients. Conclusion: Compared with CTPA performed with a modem wide-area CT scanner, LPS remains comparatively more dose-efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1280
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AAPM, 2008, 96 AAPM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L
[3]   Accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV [J].
Boone, JM ;
Seibert, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (11) :1661-1670
[4]   Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced [J].
Brenner, D. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (967) :521-523
[5]   Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study [J].
Doshi, S. K. ;
Negus, I. S. ;
Oduko, J. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (968) :653-658
[6]   Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography [J].
Einstein, Andrew J. ;
Henzlova, Milena J. ;
Rajagopalan, Sanjay .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (03) :317-323
[7]   Don't bury the V/Q scan: It's as good as multidetector CT angiograms with a lot less radiation exposure [J].
Freeman, Leonard M. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (01) :5-8
[8]  
Hartmann IJC, 2011, CT SCANNING TECHNIQU, P1
[9]   Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. [J].
Hurwitz, LM ;
Yoshizumi, T ;
Reiman, RE ;
Goodman, PC ;
Paulson, EK ;
Frush, DP ;
Toncheva, G ;
Nguyen, G ;
Barnes, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (03) :871-876
[10]  
ICRP, 1988, ANN ICRP, V18