Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment

被引:506
作者
Dagdeviren, Metin [1 ]
Yavuz, Serkan [2 ]
Kilinc, Nevzat [3 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Def Sci Inst, Dept Technol Management, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Land Forces Command, Dept Tech & Project Management, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Weapon selection; Multi criteria decision-making; AHP; TOPSIS; Fuzzy set theory; Fuzzy TOPSIS; HIERARCHY PROCESS AHP; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; EQUIPMENT SELECTION; PLANT LOCATION; AID APPROACH; MODEL; QUALITY; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The weapon selection problem is a strategic issue and has a significant impact on the efficiency of defense systems. On the other hand, selecting the optimal weapon among many alternatives is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This paper develops an evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to help the actors in defence industries for the selection of optimal weapon in a fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic values parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. The AHP is used to analyze the structure of the weapon selection problem and to determine weights of the criteria, and fuzzy TOPSIS method is used to obtain final ranking. A real world application is conducted to illustrate the utilization of the model for the weapon selection problem. The application could be interpreted as demonstrating the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8143 / 8151
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem [J].
Albayrak, E ;
Erensal, YC .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2004, 15 (04) :491-503
[2]  
[Anonymous], J INFORM OPTIM SCI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FUZZY SETS THEORY IT
[4]   A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives [J].
Ayag, Z ;
Özdemir, RG .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2006, 17 (02) :179-190
[5]   A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems [J].
Badri, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2001, 72 (01) :27-40
[6]   A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital Web sites [J].
Bilsel, R. Ufuk ;
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Ruan, Da .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (11) :1181-1197
[7]   Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain [J].
Bueyuekoezkan, Guelcin ;
Feyzioglu, Orhan ;
Nebol, Erdal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 113 (01) :148-158
[8]   Multicriteria decision-aid approach for product end-of-life alternative selection [J].
Bufardi, A ;
Gheorghe, R ;
Kiritsis, D ;
Xirouchakis, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (16) :3139-3157
[9]   Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, N. ;
Tiwari, M. K. ;
Lau, H. C. W. ;
Choy, K. L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (14) :3825-3857
[10]   Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, Niraj .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (04) :417-431