Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework

被引:989
作者
Gawer, Annabelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Imperial Coll Business Sch, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Platforms; Double-sided markets; Modularity; Economies of scope; Organizations; PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; INNOVATION; MODULARITY; NETWORKS; DESIGN; COMPETITION; ECONOMIES; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
An integrative framework is proposed to advance management research on technological platforms, bridging two theoretical perspectives: economics, which sees platforms as double-sided markets, and engineering design, which sees platforms as technological architectures. While the economic perspective informs our understanding of platform competition, the engineering design perspective informs our view of platform innovation. The article argues that platforms can be usefully conceptualized as evolving organizations or meta-organizations that: (1) federate and coordinate constitutive agents who can innovate and compete; (2) create value by generating and harnessing economies of scope in supply or/and in demand; and (3) entail a modular technological architecture composed of a core and a periphery. In support of this conceptualization, a classification system is presented, indicating that technological platforms appear in a variety of organizational forms: within firms, across supply chains, and across industry innovation ecosystems. As an illustration, the framework is then applied to derive a simple model highlighting patterns of interaction between platform innovation and competition, yielding hypotheses that could be tested empirically by future scholars. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1249
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[41]   Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel's Transformation to Platform Leader [J].
Gawer, Annabelle ;
Phillips, Nelson .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2013, 34 (08) :1035-1071
[42]  
Gulati R, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P203, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO
[43]  
2-K
[44]   Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts [J].
Gulati, Ranjay ;
Puranam, Phanish ;
Tushman, Michael .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (06) :571-586
[45]  
Hazlett T.W., 2011, 1150 GEORG MAS LAW E
[46]   Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dyanamics of diversification [J].
Helfat, CE ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (13) :1217-1232
[47]   Towards integrated optimal configuration of platform products, manufacturing processes, and supply chains [J].
Huang, GQ ;
Zhang, XY ;
Liang, L .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 23 (3-4) :267-290
[48]  
Iansiti M., 2004, The Keystone Advantage: what the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability
[49]  
Jiao J, 2007, J INTELL MANUF, V18, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2
[50]   TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN THE PRESENCE OF NETWORK EXTERNALITIES [J].
KATZ, ML ;
SHAPIRO, C .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1986, 94 (04) :822-841