Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection

被引:128
作者
Pennycook, Gordon [1 ]
Cheyne, James Allan [1 ]
Barr, Nathaniel [1 ]
Koehler, Derek J. [1 ]
Fugelsang, Jonathan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Religiosity; Cognitive style; Dual-process theories; Base-rate neglect; Conflict detection; Individual differences; Inductive reasoning; Reasoning; Social cognition; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; NEUROSCIENCE; NEED; REFLECTION; INTUITION; BELIEVE; BIAS;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent research has indicated a negative relation between the propensity for analytic reasoning and religious beliefs and practices. Here, we propose conflict detection as a mechanism underlying this relation, on the basis of the hypothesis that more-analytic people are less religious, in part, because they are more sensitive to conflicts between immaterial religious beliefs and beliefs about the material world. To examine cognitive conflict sensitivity, we presented problems containing stereotypes that conflicted with base-rate probabilities in a task with no religious content. In three studies, we found evidence that religiosity is negatively related to conflict detection during reasoning. Independent measures of analytic cognitive style also positively predicted conflict detection. The present findings provide evidence for a mechanism potentially contributing to the negative association between analytic thinking and religiosity, and more generally, they illustrate the insights to be gained from integrating individual-difference factors and contextual factors to investigate analytic reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Pennycook G., 2013, DISSOCIATING C UNPUB
  • [32] Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Cheyne, James Allan
    Koehler, Derek J.
    Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (04) : 806 - 811
  • [33] Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
    Koehler, Derek J.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2012, 124 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [34] Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Cheyne, James Allan
    Seli, Paul
    Koehler, Derek J.
    Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2012, 123 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [35] The need to believe in conflicting propositions
    Schjoedt, Uffe
    Bulbulia, Joseph
    [J]. RELIGION BRAIN & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 1 (03) : 236 - 239
  • [36] Divine Intuition: Cognitive Style Influences Belief in God
    Shenhav, Amitai
    Rand, David G.
    Greene, Joshua D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2012, 141 (03) : 423 - 428
  • [37] Stanovich K.E., 2004, ROBOTS REBELLION FIN
  • [38] Individual differences in rational thought
    Stanovich, KE
    West, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (02) : 161 - 188
  • [39] Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
    Stanovich, KE
    West, RF
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (05) : 645 - +
  • [40] Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability
    Stanovich, Keith E.
    West, Richard F.
    [J]. THINKING & REASONING, 2007, 13 (03) : 225 - 247