Framing frivolous litigation: A psychological theory

被引:72
作者
Guthrie, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Law, Ctr Study Dispute Resolut, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1600328
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Article uses an often-overlooked component of prospect theory to develop a positive theory of frivolous or low-probability litigation. The proposed Frivolous Framing Theory posits that the decision frame in frivolous litigation induces risk-seeking behavior in plaintiffs and risk-averse behavior in defendants. Because plaintiffs in frivolous litigation have a greater tolerance for risk than the defendants they have sued, plaintiffs in frivolous litigation have "psychological leverage" in settlement negotiations, which is likely to lead to plaintiff-friendly settlements or bargaining impasse. This in turn, suggests that reformers concerned about frivolous litigation should target reform efforts at plaintiffs' decisionmaking in frivolous suits.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 216
页数:54
相关论文
共 185 条
[22]  
BIRKE R, 1999, UTAH L REV, P211
[23]   Modeling frivolous suits [J].
Bone, RG .
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1997, 145 (03) :519-605
[24]   DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF ABSTRACT VS CONCRETE INFORMATION ON DECISIONS [J].
BORGIDA, E ;
NISBETT, RE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 7 (03) :258-271
[25]  
BRICKMAN L, 1996, WASH LEE L REV, V53, P1349
[26]  
Brickman L., 1996, WASH LEE L REV, V53, P1339
[27]  
Brown JG, 1997, UCLA LAW REV, V44, P1661
[28]   DECISION-PROCESSES FOR LOW PROBABILITY EVENTS - POLICY IMPLICATIONS [J].
CAMERER, CF ;
KUNREUTHER, H .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 8 (04) :565-592
[29]  
CAMERER CF, 1989, J POL ANAL MGMT, V8, P572
[30]  
Chase O. G., 1995, HOFSTRA L REV, V23, P763