Framing frivolous litigation: A psychological theory

被引:72
作者
Guthrie, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Law, Ctr Study Dispute Resolut, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1600328
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Article uses an often-overlooked component of prospect theory to develop a positive theory of frivolous or low-probability litigation. The proposed Frivolous Framing Theory posits that the decision frame in frivolous litigation induces risk-seeking behavior in plaintiffs and risk-averse behavior in defendants. Because plaintiffs in frivolous litigation have a greater tolerance for risk than the defendants they have sued, plaintiffs in frivolous litigation have "psychological leverage" in settlement negotiations, which is likely to lead to plaintiff-friendly settlements or bargaining impasse. This in turn, suggests that reformers concerned about frivolous litigation should target reform efforts at plaintiffs' decisionmaking in frivolous suits.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 216
页数:54
相关论文
共 185 条
[31]  
CLERMONT KM, 1978, CORNELL LAW REV, V63, P529
[33]  
COFFEE JC, 1986, COLUMBIA LAW REV, V86, P705
[34]   EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR UNDER RISK AND UNDER UNCERTAINTY FOR GAINS AND FOR LOSSES [J].
COHEN, M ;
JAFFRAY, JY ;
SAID, T .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 39 (01) :1-22
[35]  
COOTER RD, 1989, J ECON LIT, V27, P1067
[36]  
Coursey D.L., 1988, INT REV LAW ECON, V8, P161
[37]  
CRAVER CB, 1993, EFFECTIVE LEGAL NEGO, P124
[38]   Linguistic-numeric presentation mode effects on risky option preferences [J].
Dusenbury, R ;
Fennema, MG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 68 (02) :109-122
[39]  
DUSENBURY R, 1996, ORG BEHAV HUM DECISI, V68, P119
[40]  
FINKELSTEIN MO, 1990, STAT LAWYERS, P164