Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions

被引:172
作者
Feher, Miklos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hlth Network, Campbell Family Inst Breast Canc Res, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2006.03.009
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This article reviews the application of consensus scoring for cases when the target 3D structure is known. Comparing the performance of different methods is not a trivial task, and it appears that consensus scoring usually substantially improves virtual screening performance, contributing to better enrichments. It also seems to improve - albeit less dramatically - the prediction of bound conformations and poses. The prediction of binding energies is still rather inaccurate and although consensus scoring generally improves these predictions, more development is required before it can be used for this purpose in routine lead optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 428
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   APPLICATION OF GENETIC FUNCTION APPROXIMATION TO QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY-RELATIONSHIPS AND QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS [J].
ROGERS, D ;
HOPFINGER, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1994, 34 (04) :854-866
[32]  
Schulz-Gasch Tanja, 2004, Drug Discov Today Technol, V1, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.08.004
[33]   A comparative study of ligand-receptor complex binding affinity prediction methods based on glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors [J].
So, SS ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1999, 13 (03) :243-258
[34]   Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: An application of genetic neural networks [J].
So, SS ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 39 (07) :1521-1530
[35]   Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening [J].
Stahl, M ;
Rarey, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 44 (07) :1035-1042
[36]   A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities [J].
Terp, GE ;
Johansen, BN ;
Christensen, IT ;
Jorgensen, FS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 44 (14) :2333-2343
[37]   Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: Avoiding artificial enrichment [J].
Verdonk, ML ;
Berdini, V ;
Hartshorn, MJ ;
Mooij, WTM ;
Murray, CW ;
Taylor, RD ;
Watson, P .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2004, 44 (03) :793-806
[38]   How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment [J].
Wang, RX ;
Wang, SM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2001, 41 (05) :1422-1426
[39]   Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking [J].
Wang, RX ;
Lu, YP ;
Wang, SM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 46 (12) :2287-2303
[40]   Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction [J].
Wang, RX ;
Lai, LH ;
Wang, SM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2002, 16 (01) :11-26