The dual role of a loop with low loop contact distance in folding and domain swapping

被引:20
作者
Linhananta, A [1 ]
Zhou, HY [1 ]
Zhou, YQ [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Ctr Single Mol Biophys, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
关键词
total contact distance; loop contact distance; protein folding; domain-swapping; loop formation; fragment B of protein A;
D O I
10.1110/ps.0205002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
alpha helices, beta strands, and loops are the basic building blocks of protein structure. The folding kinetics of alpha helices and beta strands have been investigated extensively. However, little is known about the formation of loops. Experimental studies show that for some proteins, the formation of a single loop is the rate-determining step for folding, whereas for others, a loop (or turn) can misfold to serve as the hinge loop region for domain-swapped species. Computer simulations of an all-atom model of fragment B of Staphylococcal protein A found that the formation of a single loop initiates the dominant folding pathway. On the other hand, the stability analysis of intermediates suggests that the same loop is a likely candidate to serve as a hinge loop for domain swapping. To interpret the simulation result, we developed a simple structural parameter: the loop contact distance (LCD), or the sequence distance of contacting residues between a loop and the rest of the protein. The parameter is applied to a number of other proteins, including SH3 domains and prion protein. The results suggest that a locally interacting loop (low LCD) can either promote folding or serve as the hinge region for domain swapping. Thus, there is an intimate connection between folding and domain swapping, a possible cause of misfolding and aggregation.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1701
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   Transition states and the meaning of Φ-values in protein folding kinetics [J].
Ozkan, SB ;
Bahar, I ;
Dill, KA .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (09) :765-769
[32]   Is the molten globule a third phase of proteins? [J].
Pande, VS ;
Rokhsar, DS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (04) :1490-1494
[33]   Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins [J].
Plaxco, KW ;
Simons, KT ;
Baker, D .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 277 (04) :985-994
[34]  
Riddle DS, 1999, NAT STRUCT BIOL, V6, P1016
[35]   HOW DOES A PROTEIN FOLD [J].
SALI, A ;
SHAKHNOVICH, E ;
KARPLUS, M .
NATURE, 1994, 369 (6477) :248-251
[36]   Dimer formation through domain swapping in the crystal structure of the Grb2-SH2-Ac-pYVNV complex [J].
Schiering, N ;
Casale, E ;
Caccia, P ;
Giordano, P ;
Battistini, C .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 39 (44) :13376-13382
[37]  
Schlunegger MP, 1997, ADV PROTEIN CHEM, V50, P61, DOI 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60319-8
[38]   Energetic frustration and the nature of the transition state in protein folding [J].
Shea, JE ;
Onuchic, JN ;
Brooks, CL .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 113 (17) :7663-7671
[39]   Exploring the origins of topological frustration: Design of a minimally frustrated model of fragment B of protein A [J].
Shea, JE ;
Onuchic, JN ;
Brooks, CL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (22) :12512-12517
[40]   Crystal structure of cyanovirin-N, a potent HIV-inactivating protein, shows unexpected domain swapping [J].
Yang, F ;
Bewley, CA ;
Louis, JM ;
Gustafson, KR ;
Boyd, MR ;
Gronenborn, AM ;
Clore, GM ;
Wlodawer, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 288 (03) :403-412