Dose reduction at abdominal CT imaging:: Reduced tension (kV) or reduced intensity (mAs)?

被引:9
作者
Dion, AM
Berger, F
Hélie, O
Ott, D
Spiegel, A
Cordoliani, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Instruct Armees Val de Grace, Serv Imag Med, Paris, France
[2] Hop Instruct Armees St Anne, Serv Med Collect & Etudes Stat, St Mande, France
来源
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE | 2004年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
radiation; exposure; CT; dose; protection;
D O I
10.1016/S0221-0363(04)97596-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose. To compare low-dose protocols using either reduction of the rension (kV) or reduction of the intensity (mAs) at abdominal CT imaging, with reference to image quality. Materials and Methods. Fifty adult patients, weighing less than 55kg, were prospectively included among patients referred for abdominal CT examination when the protocol required a noncontrast study. The images obtained with the standard protocol (120kV, 200mAs) were compared to 4 additional test images, two obtained with low intensity (120kV, 100mAs) and two obtained with low tension (100kV, 200mAs). Two senior radiologists blindly reviewed all images using both subjective (itemized list) and objective criteria (measure of standard deviation for density measurements obtained of the liver parenchyma). Results. The image quality of the low kV protocol was better than the image quality of the low mAs protocol for both subjective and objective criteria. Conclusion. For abdominal CT imaging of standard to thin adult patients or children, dose reduction using a low kV protocol may be an alternative to a protocol using a low intensity. This can easily be implemented and can be used in conjunction with a dose reducing software.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 380
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
Boyer B., 2002, FEUILL RADIOL, V42, P239
[2]
Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[3]
Cordoliani Y, 2002, J RADIOL, V83, P685
[4]
DUTREIX J, 1969, IMAGE RADIOLOGIQUE T, P259
[5]
GALANSKI M, 1998, GANZKORPER COMPUTERT, P60
[6]
Giraud JY, 2001, J RADIOL, V82, P45
[7]
Multi-detector row CT: Radiation dose characteristics [J].
Hamberg, LM ;
Rhea, JT ;
Hunter, GJ ;
Thrall, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (03) :762-772
[8]
Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: Effect on image quality [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Prasad, S ;
Saini, S ;
Blake, MA ;
Varghese, J ;
Halpern, EF ;
Thrall, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) :1101-1106
[9]
Nagel HD, 2000, RAD EXPOSURE COMPUTE
[10]
Radiation exposures to patients from CT: Reality, public perception, and policy [J].
Nickoloff, EL ;
Alderson, PO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :285-287