Effects of different processing conditions on line edge roughness for 193nm and 157nm resists

被引:18
作者
Ercken, M [1 ]
Leunissen, LHA [1 ]
Pollentier, I [1 ]
Patsis, GP [1 ]
Constantoudis, V [1 ]
Gogolides, E [1 ]
机构
[1] IMEC, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
来源
METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XVIII, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2004年 / 5375卷
关键词
line edge roughness (LER); metrology; 193 and 157nm lithography; shallow trench isolation (STI);
D O I
10.1117/12.537339
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The control and minimization of resist line edge (or width) roughness (LER or LWR) is increasing in importance. It requires first a complete and reliable characterization scheme of LER, including frequency dependency, and then an investigation and understanding of its origins and methods for improvement. A new characterization method, introduced by Demokritos and based on the offline analysis of top-down SEM pictures, has been evaluated and compared to more conventional inline measurements. This enables us to include additional parameters that quantify the spatial aspects of LER, next to the classical LER 3sigma value. The spatial frequency dependence can also be determined from the inline measurements. Both techniques are applied to several test cases: the impact on LER of changing softbake (SB) and post-exposure bake (PEB) temperature, and changing aerial image contrast (AIC). Also, the improvements in an etch optimization experiment are quantified. The majority of the work is concentrating on 193nm resists, but initial experiments with a 157nm resist will be shown. This work has led to a better understanding of some of the contributors to fine edge roughness and gives the possibility to quantify process improvements in a better way.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 275
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Line edge roughness of chemically amplified resists [J].
Azuma, T ;
Chiba, K ;
Imabeppu, M ;
Kawamura, D ;
Onishi, Y .
ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XVII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 3999 :264-269
[2]  
Barabasi A.-L., 1995, FRACTAL CONCEPTS SUR, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511599798, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511599798]
[3]   Quantification of line-edge roughness of photoresists. II. Scaling and fractal analysis and the best roughness descriptors [J].
Constantoudis, V ;
Patsis, GP ;
Tserepi, A ;
Gogolides, E .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2003, 21 (03) :1019-1026
[4]   Experimental investigation of the impact of line-edge roughness on MOSFET performance and yield [J].
Croon, JA ;
Leunissen, LHA ;
Jurczak, M ;
Benndorf, M ;
Rooyackers, R ;
Ronse, K ;
Decoutere, S ;
Sansen, W ;
Maes, HE .
ESSDERC 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD EUROPEAN SOLID-STATE DEVICE RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2003, :227-230
[5]  
Croon JA, 2002, INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES 2002 MEETING, TECHNICAL DIGEST, P307, DOI 10.1109/IEDM.2002.1175840
[6]  
DOMBROWSKI KF, 1999, P IEDM, P257
[7]  
ERCKEN M, 2002, P INTERFACE
[8]   Effect of process parameters on pattern edge roughness of chemically-amplified resists [J].
Koh, HP ;
Lin, QY ;
Hu, X ;
Chan, L .
ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XVII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 3999 :240-251
[9]   Spatial frequency analysis of line edge roughness in nine chemically related photoresists. [J].
Lawrence, WG .
ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XX, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, 5039 :713-724
[10]  
LEUNISSEN LHA, IN PRESS MICROELECTR