Sensitive, high throughput HPLC-MS/MS method with on-line sample clean-up for everolimus measurement

被引:38
作者
Korecka, Magdalena [1 ]
Solari, Sandra G. [1 ]
Shaw, Leslie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
everolimus; SDZ RAD 227-756; ascomycin; on-line sample clean-up; switching valve; HPLC-MS/MS;
D O I
10.1097/00007691-200608000-00002
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
A new HPLC-MS/MS method for everolimus measurement was developed that includes the following features: small sample volume, short run time, fast, simple and cost-efficient sample preparation, assessment of performance of two internal standards (IS), SDZ RAD 223-756 and ascomycin and comparison of the method with an HPLC-MS/MS reference method. The authors established a multiple reaction monitoring positive ion HPLC-MS/MS method with on-line extraction and sample cleanup. This procedure includes: an API 2000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with turbo-ion spray, built-in Valco switching valve, an HPLC system; guard column; a Nova-Pak C18 analytical column; washing solution, methanol:30mM ammonium acetate pH 5.1 (80:20); eluting solution, methanol:30 mM ammonium acetate pH 5.1 (97:3); flow rate 0.8 mL/min; and a run time of 2.8 minutes. The first and third quadrupoles were set to detect the ammonium adduct ion and a high mass fragment of everolimus (m/z 975.5 -> 908.5), and two ISs: SDZ RAD 223-756 (m/z 989.8 -> 922.8) and ascomycin (m/z 809.5-756.5). The LLOQ was 1.0 mu g/L for everolimus using either IS. Between day precision ranged from 3.1% to 5.7% for SDZ RAD 223-756 and 6.0% to 8.6% for ascomycin using spiked blood with everolimus concentrations 2.0 to 25.0 mu g/L. Absolute recoveries using spiked samples over the range of 2.5 to 25 mu g/L averaged 77.3% (SDZ RAD 223-756) and 76.8% (ascomycin). No matrix effect on everolimus was demonstrated based on the mean observed signal detection of 98.6% (SDZ RAD 223-756) and 105% (ascomycin). Comparison of everolimus concentrations obtained using this method with two internal standards with a reference laboratory demonstrated that the mean everolimus concentration obtained with ascomycin was statistically different (lower) than results with the reference method and the method that used SDZ RAD 223-756 as the internal standard gave equivalent results compared with the reference method.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 490
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[31]   Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in heart transplant recipients based on exposure-effect modeling [J].
Starling, RC ;
Hare, JM ;
Hauptman, P ;
McCurry, KR ;
Mayer, HW ;
Kovarik, JM ;
Schmidli, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (12) :2126-2131
[32]  
Streit F, 2002, CLIN CHEM, V48, P955
[33]   Matrix effects: The Achilles heel of quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Taylor, PJ .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 38 (04) :328-334