Nordic laboratory intercomparison of supercritical fluid extraction for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbon, polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil

被引:30
作者
Hartonen, K
Bowadt, S
Dybdahl, HP
Nylund, K
Sporring, S
Lund, H
Oreld, F
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Chem, Analyt Chem Lab, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Danish Hydraul Inst, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
[3] Stockholm Univ, ITM, Inst Appl Environm Res, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] SINTEF, Appl Chem, N-0314 Oslo, Norway
关键词
supercritical fluid extraction; total petroleum hydrocarbon; polychlorinated biphenyls; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons;
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00401-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two developed supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) methods [one for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and one for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and creosote components in soil] were evaluated in a Nordic laboratory intercomparison study with I I participating laboratories. The interlaboratory comparison showed that excellent recoveries can be obtained with SFE for PAHs and PCBs compared to the solvent extraction. For the TPH, the recoveries were significantly higher than those achieved with solvent extraction. The accuracy, expressed as the relative standard deviation, was higher than expected (generally 8-25% for PAHs, 6-20% for PCBs and less than 18% for TPH with a few very high values, especially for PCBs), but not different from the other intercomparison studies. Difference between liquid- and solid-phase collection in SFE was found to be significant only for more volatile PAH components such as naphthalene and fluorene. For PCBs and TPH, there were some variation in the results obtained with the two trapping methods. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 248
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Intercomparison among SFE, ASE, Soxhlet and sonication for the trialkylamine determination in sediment and sludge [J].
Alzaga, R ;
Maldonado, C ;
Bayona, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 72 (02) :99-111
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ISO 5725-2 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method
[3]  
Assis LM, 2000, J MICROCOLUMN SEP, V12, P292, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(2000)12:5<292::AID-MCS3>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-X
[5]   Summarizing the effectiveness of supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from natural matrix environmental samples [J].
Benner, BA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 70 (21) :4594-4601
[6]   Comparison of different drying, extraction and detection techniques for the determination of priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in background contaminated soil samples [J].
Berset, JD ;
Ejem, M ;
Holzer, R ;
Lischer, P .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1999, 383 (03) :263-275
[7]   Pressurized fluid extraction of polychlorinated biphenyls in solid environmental samples [J].
Björklund, E ;
Bowadt, S ;
Nilsson, T ;
Mathiasson, L .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1999, 836 (02) :285-293
[8]   SUPERCRITICAL-FLUID EXTRACTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSIS [J].
BOWADT, S ;
HAWTHORNE, SB .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1995, 703 (1-2) :549-571
[9]   ANALYSIS OF PCBS IN SULFUR-CONTAINING SEDIMENTS BY OFF-LINE SUPERCRITICAL-FLUID EXTRACTION AND HRGC-ECD [J].
BOWADT, S ;
JOHANSSON, B .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 66 (05) :667-673
[10]   INDEPENDENT COMPARISON OF SOXHLET AND SUPERCRITICAL-FLUID EXTRACTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PCBS IN AN INDUSTRIAL SOIL [J].
BOWADT, S ;
JOHANSSON, B ;
WUNDERLI, S ;
ZENNEGG, M ;
DEALENCASTRO, LF ;
GRANDJEAN, D .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (14) :2424-2430