CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options

被引:571
作者
McCollough, Cynthia H. [1 ]
Bruesewitz, Michael R. [1 ]
Kofler, James M., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.262055138
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In the past decade, the tremendous advances in computed tomography (CT) technology and applications have increased the clinical utilization of CT, creating concerns about individual and population doses of ionizing radiation. Scanner manufacturers have subsequently implemented several options to appropriately manage or reduce the radiation dose from CT. Modulation of the x-ray tube current during scanning is one effective method of managing the dose. However, the distinctions between the various tube current modulation products are not clear from the product names or descriptions. Depending on the scanner model, the tube current may be modulated according to patient attenuation or a sinusoidal-type function. The modulation may be fully preprogrammed, implemented in near-real time by using a feedback mechanism, or achieved with both preprogramming and a feedback loop. The dose modulation may occur angularly around the patient, along the long axis of the patient, or both. Finally, the system may allow use of one of several algorithms to automatically adjust the current to achieve the desired image quality. Modulation both angularly around the patient and along the z-axis is optimal, but the tube current must be appropriately adapted to patient size for diagnostic image quality to be achieved. (C) RSNA, 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / U14
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Dose reduction in pediatric CT: A rational approach [J].
Boone, JM ;
Geraghty, EM ;
Seibert, JA ;
Wootton-Gorges, SL .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (02) :352-360
[2]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[3]   Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital [J].
Donnelly, LF ;
Emery, KH ;
Brody, AS ;
Laor, T ;
Gylys-Morin, VM ;
Anton, CG ;
Thomas, SR ;
Frush, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :303-306
[4]   Computed tomography and radiation risks: What pediatric health care providers should know [J].
Frush, DP ;
Donnelly, LF ;
Rosen, NS .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 112 (04) :951-957
[5]   THE EFFECT OF MAS VARIATION UPON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE QUALITY AS EVALUATED BY INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
HAAGA, JR ;
MIRALDI, F ;
MACINTYRE, W ;
LIPUMA, JP ;
BRYAN, PJ ;
WIESEN, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 138 (02) :449-454
[6]   Radiation dose management: Weighing risk versus benefit [J].
Haaga, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :289-291
[7]   Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements [J].
Kalender, WA ;
Wolf, H ;
Suess, C .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2248-2253
[8]   Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Maher, MM ;
Toth, TL ;
Hamberg, LM ;
Blake, MA ;
Shephard, JA ;
Saini, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :619-628
[9]   Radiation exposures to patients from CT: Reality, public perception, and policy [J].
Nickoloff, EL ;
Alderson, PO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :285-287