A meta-analysis of humor in advertising

被引:286
作者
Eisend, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] European Univ Viadrina, D-15230 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Humor in advertising; Meta-analysis; Generalization; PROGRAM CONTEXT; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; RESPONSES; ATTITUDE; MODEL; AD; ADVERTISEMENTS; ANTECEDENTS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis combines 369 correlations on the effects of humor in advertising and thus quantifies, updates, and expands previous literature reviews on the effects of humor in advertising. In line with previous reviews, the meta-analytic correlations demonstrate that humor in advertising significantly enhances A(AD), attention, and positive affect. Contrary to the assumptions of previous reviews, there is no evidence that humor impacts positive or negative cognitions, and liking of the advertiser. The meta-analytic findings clarify some ambiguous prior conclusions: humor significantly reduces source credibility, enhances positive affect, A(BR) and purchase intention. The decline from lower order to higher order communication effects is particularly strong, with the effect size of the impact of humor on A(AD) being twice as large as the effect size for A(BR). This impact of humor in advertising has been rather stable over the past decades. A moderator analysis reveals, however, that the findings of academic humor research are somewhat biased. As for the underlying theory, the positive and linear relationship between the funniness of the ad and brand attitudes supports an affective mechanism underlying the impact of humor in advertising.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 203
页数:13
相关论文
共 111 条
[51]   Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: A meta-analysis [J].
Grewal, D ;
Kavanoor, S ;
Fern, EF ;
Costley, C ;
Barnes, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (04) :1-15
[52]  
Gulas C.S., 2006, HUMOR ADVERTISING CO
[53]  
Hedges L.V., 1994, The handbook of research synthesis, P285
[54]  
Hedges LV., 1985, STAT METHODS METAANA, DOI [10.1016/C2009-0-03396-0, DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-03396-0]
[55]  
Hofstede G., 1980, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE
[56]  
House R. J., 2004, Culture, leadership, and organizations
[57]   A process analysis of the effects of humorous advertising executions on brand claims memory [J].
Krishnan, HS ;
Chakravarti, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :230-245
[58]   MODERATING INFLUENCE OF SELF-MONITORING AND GENDER ON RESPONSES TO HUMOROUS ADVERTISING [J].
LAMMERS, HB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 131 (01) :57-69
[59]   HUMOR AND COGNITIVE RESPONSES TO ADVERTISING STIMULI - A TRACE CONSOLIDATION APPROACH [J].
LAMMERS, HB ;
LEIBOWITZ, L ;
SEYMOUR, GE ;
HENNESSEY, JE .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1983, 11 (02) :173-185
[60]   Effects of anti-tobacco advertisements based on risk-taking tendencies: Realistic fear vs. vulgar humor [J].
Lee, MJ ;
Ferguson, MA .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2002, 79 (04) :945-963