Quantitative elastic-property information with acoustic AFM: measurements and modeling

被引:2
作者
Hurley, DC [1 ]
Wiehn, JS [1 ]
Turner, JA [1 ]
Rice, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Div Mat Reliabil, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
来源
NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION AND RELIABILITY OF MICRO-AND NANOMATERIAL SYSTEMS | 2002年 / 4703卷
关键词
atomic force acoustic microscopy; elastic properties; thin films;
D O I
10.1117/12.469632
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
To investigate nanoscale mechanical behavior, new approaches using dynamic modes of the atomic force microscope cantilever are being developed. One method, atomic force acoustic microscopy (AFAM), measures cantilever resonances in the acoustic-frequency range to obtain elastic-property information. We describe quantitative AFAM measurements and compare them to results from techniques like surface acoustic waves and instrumented indentation. With AFAM we examined a niobium film using two separate calibration samples and two cantilever geometries. Depending on the cantilever type we found M-Nb=105-114 GPa, in good agreement with literature values of M-Nb=116-133 GPa for bulk niobium and M-Nb=120+/-5 GPa obtained with surface acoustic waves. We also obtained AFAM values of M=54-81 GPa for the indentation modulus of an aluminum film. In comparison, literature values for bulk aluminum are M-Al=76-81 GPa, while other results on the same film yielded M-Al=78-85 GPa. To understand the results more thoroughly, we compare two methods of AFAM spectrum analysis. The analytical approach assumes a cantilever of uniform rectangular cross-section while the finite element model accounts for spatial variations in cantilever dimensions. The same data are interpreted with the two approaches to better understand measurement uncertainty and accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
DAVIS JR, 1998, METALS HDB, P115
[2]  
GRIMVALL G, 1999, THERMOPHYSICAL PROPE, P36
[3]   Surface acoustic wave methods to determine the anisotropic elastic properties of thin films [J].
Hurley, DC ;
Tewary, VK ;
Richards, AJ .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (09) :1486-1494
[4]  
LINDSAY BR, 1989, PHYSICS VADE MECUM, P56
[5]   ELASTIC MODULI OF SILICON VS HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AT 25.0DEGREECS + MINUS195.8DEGREESC [J].
MCSKIMIN, HJ ;
ANDREATCH, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1964, 35 (07) :2161-&
[6]   AN IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING HARDNESS AND ELASTIC-MODULUS USING LOAD AND DISPLACEMENT SENSING INDENTATION EXPERIMENTS [J].
OLIVER, WC ;
PHARR, GM .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1992, 7 (06) :1564-1583
[7]  
Papadaskis EP., 1976, Physical acoustics: principles and methods, V12, P277, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-477912-9.50010-2
[8]   Imaging and measurement of local mechanical material properties by atomic force acoustic microscopy [J].
Rabe, U ;
Amelio, S ;
Kopycinska, M ;
Hirsekorn, S ;
Kempf, M ;
Göken, M ;
Arnold, W .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2002, 33 (02) :65-70
[9]   Quantitative determination of contact stiffness using atomic force acoustic microscopy [J].
Rabe, U ;
Amelio, S ;
Kester, E ;
Scherer, V ;
Hirsekorn, S ;
Arnold, W .
ULTRASONICS, 2000, 38 (1-8) :430-437
[10]   Vibrations of free and surface-coupled atomic force microscope cantilevers: Theory and experiment [J].
Rabe, U ;
Janser, K ;
Arnold, W .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1996, 67 (09) :3281-3293