2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline

被引:1148
作者
Smith, Thomas J. [1 ]
Khatcheressian, James [1 ]
Lyman, Gary H. [1 ]
Ozer, Howard [1 ]
Armitage, James O. [1 ]
Balducci, Lodovico [1 ]
Bennett, Charles L. [1 ]
Cantor, Scott B. [1 ]
Crawford, Jeffrey [1 ]
Cross, Scott J. [1 ]
Demetri, George [1 ]
Desch, Christopher E. [1 ]
Pizzo, Philip A. [1 ]
Schiffer, Charles A. [1 ]
Schwartzberg, Lee [1 ]
Somerfield, Mark R. [1 ]
Somlo, George [1 ]
Wade, James C. [1 ]
Wade, James L. [1 ]
Winn, Rodger J. [1 ]
Wozniak, Antoinette J. [1 ]
Wolff, Antonio C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To update the 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF). Update Methodology The Update Committee completed a review and analysis of pertinent data published from 1999 through September 2005. Guided by the 1996 ASCO clinical outcomes criteria, the Update Committee formulated recommendations based on improvements in survival, quality of life, toxicity reduction and cost-effectiveness. Recommendations The 2005 Update Committee agreed unanimously that reduction in febrile neutropenia (FN) is an important clinical outcome that justifies the use of CSFs, regardless of impact on other factors, when the risk of FN is approximately 20% and no other equally effective regimen that does not require CSFs is available. Primary prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of FN in patients who are at high risk based on age, medical history, disease characteristics, and myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen. CSF use allows a modest to moderate increase in dose-density and/or dose-intensity of chemotherapy regimens. Dose-dense regimens should only be used within an appropriately designed clinical trial or if supported by convincing efficacy data. Prophylactic CSF for patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma aged 65 years and older treated with curative chemotherapy (CHOP or more aggressive regimens) should be given to reduce the incidence of FN and infections. Current recommendations for the management of patients exposed to lethal doses of total body radiotherapy, but not doses high enough to lead to certain death due to injury to other organs, includes the prompt administration of CSF or pegylated G-CSF.
引用
收藏
页码:3187 / 3205
页数:19
相关论文
共 127 条
  • [71] RANDOMIZED PHASE-II COMPARISON OF STANDARD CHOP WITH WEEKLY CHOP IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    MEYER, RM
    BROWMAN, GP
    SAMOSH, ML
    BENGER, AM
    BRYANTLUKOSIUS, D
    WILSON, WEC
    FRANK, GL
    LEBER, BF
    STERNBACH, MS
    FOSTER, GA
    SKINGLEY, P
    LEVINE, MN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (09) : 2386 - 2393
  • [72] The impact of age on delivered dose intensity and hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving initial CHOP chemotherapy: A risk factor analysis
    Morrison, VA
    Picozzi, V
    Scott, S
    Pohlman, B
    Dickman, E
    Lee, M
    Lawless, G
    Kerr, R
    Caggiano, V
    Delgado, D
    Fridman, M
    Ford, J
    Carter, WB
    [J]. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, 2001, 2 (01): : 47 - 56
  • [73] Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial
    Nabholtz, JM
    Falkson, C
    Campos, D
    Szanto, J
    Martin, M
    Chan, S
    Pienkowski, T
    Zaluski, J
    Pinter, T
    Krzakowski, M
    Vorobiof, D
    Leonard, R
    Kennedy, I
    Azli, N
    Murawsky, M
    Riva, A
    Pouillart, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (06) : 968 - 975
  • [74] Phase II study of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
    Nabholtz, JM
    Mackey, JR
    Smylie, M
    Paterson, A
    Noël, DR
    Al-Tweigeri, T
    Tonkin, K
    North, S
    Azli, N
    Riva, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (02) : 314 - 321
  • [75] NASH RA, 1994, BLOOD, V83, P1963
  • [76] Neelis KJ, 1997, EXP HEMATOL, V25, P1084
  • [77] Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced-disseminated germ cell tumors: An eastern cooperative oncology group, southwest oncology group, and cancer and leukemia group B study
    Nichols, CR
    Catalano, PJ
    Crawford, ED
    Vogelzang, NJ
    Einhorn, LH
    Loehrer, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (04) : 1287 - 1293
  • [78] Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer
    Noda, W
    Nishiwaki, Y
    Kawahara, M
    Negoro, S
    Sugiura, T
    Yokoyama, A
    Fukuoka, M
    Mori, K
    Watanabe, K
    Tamura, T
    Yamamoto, S
    Saijo, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [79] Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: Results of a randomized phase III clinical trial
    Northfelt, DW
    Dezube, BJ
    Thommes, JA
    Miller, BJ
    Fischl, MA
    Friedman-Kien, A
    Kaplan, LD
    Du Mond, C
    Mamelok, RD
    Henry, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (07) : 2445 - 2451
  • [80] Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer
    O'Connell, MJ
    Laurie, JA
    Kahn, M
    Fitzgibbons, RJ
    Erlichman, C
    Shepherd, L
    Moertel, CG
    Kocha, WI
    Pazdur, R
    Wieand, HS
    Rubin, J
    Vukov, AM
    Donohue, JH
    Krook, JE
    Figueredo, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (01) : 295 - 300