Evaluation of two approaches to characterise liquid chromatographic columns using pharmaceutical separations

被引:28
作者
Dragovic, Sanja [1 ]
Haghedooren, Erik [1 ]
Nemeth, Tamas [1 ,2 ]
Palabiyik, I. Murat [1 ,3 ]
Hoogmartens, Jos [1 ]
Adams, Erwin [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Farmaceut Anal, O&N 2,PB 923,Herestr 49, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Natl Inst Pharm, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Ankara Univ, Dept Analyt Chem, Fac Pharm, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Stationary phase; Chromatographic parameters; Column characterisation system; Comparison; Pharmaceutical separations; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; ALKYL-SILICA COLUMNS; REVERSED-PHASE COLUMNS; TEST PARAMETERS; STATIONARY PHASES; MINIMAL NUMBER; CLASSIFICATION; SELECTIVITY; RETENTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2009.02.023
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this paper a comparison of two column characterisation systems is reported: the method based on the hydrophobic-subtraction model of Dolan and Snyder (HS method) versus the method developed at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL method). Comparison was done for seven different pharmaceutical separations (fluoxetine, gemcitabine, erythromycin, tetracycline, tetracaine, amlodipine and bisacodyl), using a set of 59 columns. A ranking was built based on an F value (KUL) or F-s value (HS) versus a (virtual) reference column. Both methods showed similar probabilities of ranking patterns. Correlation of the respective test parameters of both approaches was poor. Both methods are not perfect and do not match well, but anyhow yield results which allow, with a relatively high certainty, the selection of similar or dissimilar columns as compared to a reference column. An analyst that uses either of the two methods will end up with a similar probability to choose an adequate column. From a practical point of view, it must be noted that the KUL method is easier to use. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3210 / 3216
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EUR PHARM
[2]   Comparative characteristics of HPLC columns based on quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) and hydrophobic-subtraction model [J].
Baczek, T ;
Kaliszan, R ;
Novotná, K ;
Jandera, P .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1075 (1-2) :109-115
[3]  
*COUNC EUR, 2006, TETR HYDR MON PHARM, V183, P494
[4]   Relevance of π-π and dipole-dipole interactions for retention on cyano and phenyl columns in reversed-phase liquid chromatography [J].
Croes, K ;
Steffens, A ;
Marchand, DH ;
Snyder, LR .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1098 (1-2) :123-130
[5]   Chromatographic classification of commercially available reverse-phase HPLC columns [J].
Cruz, E ;
Euerby, MR ;
Johnson, CM ;
Hackett, CA .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 1997, 44 (3-4) :151-161
[6]  
Dehouck P, 2004, LC GC EUR, V17, P592
[7]   Characterisation of reversed-phase liquid-chromatographic columns by chromatographic tests -: Comparing column classification based on chromatographic parameters and column performance for the separation of acetylsalicylic acid and related compounds [J].
Dehouck, P ;
Visky, D ;
Vander Heyden, Y ;
Adams, E ;
Kovács, Z ;
Noszál, B ;
Massart, DL ;
Hoogmartens, J .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1025 (02) :189-200
[8]   Choosing an equivalent replacement column for a reversed-phase liquid chromatographic assay procedure [J].
Dolan, JW ;
Maule, A ;
Bingley, D ;
Wrisley, L ;
Chan, CC ;
Angod, M ;
Lunte, C ;
Krisko, R ;
Winston, JM ;
Homeier, BA ;
McCalley, DV ;
Snyder, LR .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1057 (1-2) :59-74
[9]   Chromatographic classification and comparison of commercially available reversed-phase liquid chromatographic columns using principal component analysis [J].
Euerby, M ;
Petersson, P .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 994 (1-2) :13-36
[10]  
Euerby M.R., 2000, LC GC EUR, V13, P665