Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions

被引:78
作者
Benjamin, Aaron S. [1 ]
Bird, Randy D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
memory; metamemory; judgments of learning; spacing effect; self-regulated study;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.003
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Rememberers play an active role in learning, not only by committing material more or less faithfully to memory, but also by selecting judicious study strategies (or not). In three experiments, subjects chose whether to mass or space the second presentation of to-be-learned paired-associate terms that were either normatively difficult or easy to remember, under the constraint that subjects needed to space exactly half of the items (and mass the other half). In contrast with recent findings that implemented no such constraint (Son, 2004), subjects chose to space more of the difficult pairs (in Experiments 1 and 2). Reduction in exposure time eliminated but did not reverse this effect (Experiment 3). Subjects who spaced more of the difficult pairs were more likely to exhibit superior memory performance, but, because subjects who made spacing selections that had no effect on the actual scheduling of items also showed this effect (Experiment 2), that enhancement in performance is more likely to reflect subject selection than strategy efficacy. Overall, these results suggest that choice constraints strongly elicit a discrepancy-reduction approach (Dunlosky & Hertzog, 1998) to strategic decision-making, but that reduced study time can eliminate this effect. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   DO MEMORABILITY RATINGS AFFECT STUDY-TIME ALLOCATION [J].
MAZZONI, G ;
CORNOLDI, C ;
MARCHITELLI, G .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1990, 18 (02) :196-204
[12]   The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning [J].
Metcalfe, J ;
Kornell, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (04) :530-542
[13]   Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? [J].
Metcalfe, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2002, 131 (03) :349-363
[14]  
Nelson D. L., 1998, U S FLORIDA WORD ASS
[15]  
Nelson T.O., 1990, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V26, P125, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
[16]   ALLOCATION OF SELF-PACED STUDY TIME AND THE LABOR-IN-VAIN EFFECT [J].
NELSON, TO ;
LEONESIO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1988, 14 (04) :676-686
[17]   SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN METAMEMORY - JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING AND FEELINGS OF KNOWING [J].
SCHWARTZ, BL .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1994, 1 (03) :357-375
[18]   PERSISTENCE OF SPACING EFFECT IN FREE-RECALL UNDER VARYING INCIDENTAL-LEARNING CONDITIONS [J].
SHAUGHNESSY, JJ .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1976, 4 (04) :369-377
[19]   Metacognition in motor learning [J].
Simon, DA ;
Bjork, RA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (04) :907-912
[20]   Spacing one's study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy [J].
Son, LK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (03) :601-604