Torsional fatigue and endurance limit of a size 30.06 ProFile rotary instrument

被引:28
作者
Best, S
Watson, P
Pilliar, R
Kulkarni, GGK
Yared, G
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Biomat, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
关键词
endurance limit; nickel-titanium; torsional fatigue;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00814.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the torsional cyclic fatigue characteristics and specifically the endurance limit (EL) of a nickel-titanium rotary instrument. Methodology Size 30.06 taper ProFile instruments were evaluated. The equipment was assembled according to the ANSI/ADA Specification No. 28. The motor was programmed to repeatedly rotate to a selected deflection angle (DA) and then return to zero (cycle). Testing started at 200degrees and was continued at decreasing angles until 10(6) cycles were reached without instrument fracture. Ten instruments were tested at each DA. The mean log number of cycles to fracture and standard deviation were determined for each DA at which fracture occurred. The DA at which 10(6) cycles were reached without instrument fracture corresponded by definition to the EL. Analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons using Duncan's multiple range test were performed to detect significant differences among the mean log number of cycles of the different DA. Significance was determined at the 95% confidence level. Results Instruments cycled at larger DA consistently demonstrated fewer cycles to fracture than those cycled at smaller DA. The differences among the mean log number of cycles of the different DA were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Cycles of 10(6) were completed without instrument fracture at 2.5degrees. Conclusions A torsional fatigue profile was generated for a specific NiTi rotary instrument. The EL was 2.5degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 373
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BAILEY J, 1985, MECH TESTING, V8, P140
[2]   Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using Profile NiTi rotary instruments [J].
Blum, JY ;
Cohen, A ;
Machtou, P ;
Micallef, JP .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1999, 32 (01) :24-31
[3]   A COMPARISON OF ROOT-CANAL PREPARATIONS USING NI-TI HAND, NI-TI ENGINE-DRIVEN, AND K-FLEX ENDODONTIC INSTRUMENTS [J].
GLOSSON, CR ;
HALLER, RH ;
DOVE, SB ;
DELRIO, CE .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1995, 21 (03) :146-151
[4]   Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments [J].
Haïkel, Y ;
Serfaty, R ;
Bateman, G ;
Senger, B ;
Allemann, C .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (06) :434-440
[5]   Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure [J].
Kuhn, G ;
Tavernier, B ;
Jordan, L .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (08) :516-520
[6]  
Lindeburg M R., 1999, Civil Engineering Reference Manual for the PE Exam
[7]   ProTaper rotary root canal preparation:: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy [J].
Peters, OA ;
Peters, CI ;
Schönenberger, K ;
Barbakow, F .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2003, 36 (02) :93-99
[8]   Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments [J].
Pruett, JP ;
Clement, DJ ;
Carnes, DL .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1997, 23 (02) :77-85
[9]   Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use [J].
Sattapan, B ;
Nervo, GJ ;
Palamara, JEA ;
Messer, HH .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2000, 26 (03) :161-165
[10]  
SERENE TP, 1995, APPL ENDODONTICS