Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

被引:310
作者
Van Cutsem, E [1 ]
Hoff, PM
Harper, P
Bukowski, RM
Cunningham, D
Dufour, P
Graeven, U
Lokich, J
Madajewicz, S
Maroun, JA
Marshall, JL
Mitchell, EP
Perez-Manga, G
Rougier, P
Schmiegel, W
Schoelmerich, J
Sobrero, A
Schilsky, RL
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
[4] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Royal Marsden Hosp, London SW3 6JJ, England
[6] Hosp Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
[7] Ruhr Univ Bochum, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
[8] Canc Ctr Boston, Boston, MA USA
[9] SUNY Hlth Sci Ctr, Stony Brook, NY USA
[10] Ottawa Reg Canc Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4K7, Canada
[11] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Vincent T Lombardi Canc Res Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[12] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[13] Hosp Gen Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
[14] Hop Ambroise Pare, Boulogne, France
[15] Univ Regensburg Klinikum, Regensburg, Germany
[16] Clin Oncol Piazza SM Maria, Udine, Italy
[17] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
capecitabine; colorectal cancer; fluoropyrimidine; efficacy; oral;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1 - 14 every 21 days; n = 603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n = 604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% Cl 0.84-1.06, P = 0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively), Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1197
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Multicenter phase II study of bimonthly high-dose leucovorin, fluorouracil infusion, and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to the same leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen [J].
André, T ;
Bensmaine, MA ;
Louvet, C ;
François, E ;
Lucas, V ;
Desseigne, F ;
Beerblock, K ;
Bouché, O ;
Carola, E ;
Merrouche, Y ;
Morvan, F ;
Dupon-André, G ;
de Gramont, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) :3560-3568
[2]   Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin:: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Borner, MM ;
Schöffski, P ;
de Wit, R ;
Caponigro, F ;
Comella, G ;
Sulkes, A ;
Greim, G ;
Peters, GJ ;
van der Born, K ;
Wanders, J ;
de Boer, RF ;
Martin, C ;
Fumoleau, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (03) :349-358
[3]  
Borner MM, 2003, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V22, P266
[4]   First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer:: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin [J].
Cassidy, J ;
Twelves, C ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
Hoff, P ;
Bajetta, E ;
Boyer, M ;
Bugat, R ;
Burger, U ;
Garin, A ;
Graeven, U ;
McKendrick, J ;
Maroun, J ;
Marshall, J ;
Osterwalder, B ;
Pérez-Manga, G ;
Rosso, R ;
Rougier, P ;
Schilsky, RL .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) :566-575
[5]   Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Pyrhönen, S ;
James, RD ;
Punt, CJA ;
Hickish, TF ;
Heikkila, R ;
Johannesen, TB ;
Starkhammar, H ;
Topham, CA ;
Awad, L ;
Jacques, C ;
Herait, P .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) :1413-1418
[6]   Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer [J].
de Gramont, A ;
Figer, A ;
Seymour, M ;
Homerin, M ;
Hmissi, A ;
Cassidy, J ;
Boni, C ;
Cortes-Funes, H ;
Cervantes, A ;
Freyer, G ;
Papamichael, D ;
Le Bail, N ;
Louvet, C ;
Hendler, D ;
de Braud, F ;
Wilson, C ;
Morvan, F ;
Bonetti, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (16) :2938-2947
[7]   Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Douillard, JY ;
Hoff, PM ;
Skillings, JR ;
Eisenberg, P ;
Davidson, N ;
Harper, P ;
Vincent, MD ;
Lembersky, BC ;
Thompson, S ;
Maniero, A ;
Benner, SE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) :3605-3616
[8]   Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial [J].
Douillard, JY ;
Cunningham, D ;
Roth, AD ;
Navarro, M ;
James, RD ;
Karasek, P ;
Jandik, P ;
Iveson, T ;
Carmichael, J ;
Alakl, M ;
Gruia, G ;
Awad, L ;
Rougier, P .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9209) :1041-1047
[9]  
Dunst J., 2003, EJC Supplements, V1, pS86, DOI 10.1016/S1359-6349(03)90315-6
[10]  
*FDA, 1999, FDA MED OFF SUMM