Necrotic complications after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy

被引:132
作者
Komorowski, Andrzej L.
Zanini, Vittorio
Regolo, Lea
Carolei, Adriana
Wysocki, Wojciech M.
Costa, Alberto
机构
[1] Marie Sklodowska Curie Mem Inst Oncol, Dept Surg Oncol, Ctr Canc, PL-31115 Krakow, Poland
[2] Fdn Salvatore Maugeri, Dept Breast & Reconstruct Surg, Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Pavia, Dept Appl Hlth Sci, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-005-0650-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective was to analyze the frequency and factors influencing necrotic complication in female patients undergoing nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy. Summary and background data: Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy has recently been shown to yield satisfactory results in a carefully selected group of breast cancer patients. The technique includes extensive undermining of the nipple-areola complex, which may result in an increased rate of necrotic complications. We report our early experience with necrotic changes after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy. Methods: The medical records of 38 patients undergoing nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Mean age of the patient was 44.5 years (range 26-65). Necrotic complications occurred in 15.8% of patients and included: skin flap necrosis (1 case), partial nipple-areola complex necrosis (2 cases), and complete nipple-areola complex necrosis (3 cases). Two cases of capsular contraction were also recorded. Statistical analysis showed age below 45 years to be associated with a lower risk of necrotic complications (OR 4.51, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy, although resulting in a relatively high frequency of necrotic complications, is a valuable surgical option for patients with small, peripheral tumors and for women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy. The procedure seems to be safer for women under 45 years of age.
引用
收藏
页码:1410 / 1413
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? [J].
Cense, HA ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Cardozo, ML ;
Van Lanschot, JJB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (06) :521-526
[2]   Nipple-sparing mastectomy - Technique and results of 54 procedures [J].
Crowe, JP ;
Kim, JA ;
Yetman, R ;
Banbury, J ;
Patrick, RJ ;
Baynes, D .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 139 (02) :148-150
[3]   Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure [J].
Gerber, B ;
Krause, A ;
Reimer, T ;
Müller, H ;
Küchenmeister, I ;
Makovitzky, J ;
Kundt, G ;
Friese, K .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (01) :120-127
[4]   Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications [J].
Mortenson, MM ;
Schneider, PD ;
Khatri, VP ;
Stevenson, TR ;
Whetzel, TP ;
Sommerhaug, EJ ;
Goodnight, JE ;
Bold, RJ .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 139 (09) :988-991
[5]   The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction [J].
Mustonen, P ;
Lepistö, J ;
Papp, A ;
Berg, M ;
Pietiläinen, B ;
Kataja, V ;
Härmä, M .
EJSO, 2004, 30 (08) :817-823
[6]   The nipple-sparing mastectomy: Early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated [J].
Petit, JY ;
Veronesi, U ;
Orecchia, R ;
Rey, P ;
Didier, F ;
Giraldo, A ;
Luini, A ;
De Lorenzi, F ;
Rietjens, M ;
Garusi, C ;
Intra, M ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Martella, S .
TUMORI JOURNAL, 2003, 89 (03) :288-291
[7]  
Simmons RM, 2002, ANN SURG ONCOL, V9, P165
[8]   Two-year follow-up of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction [J].
Simmons, RM ;
Hollenbeck, ST ;
LaTrenta, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) :403-406