The distortion of criteria after decision-making

被引:19
作者
Phillips, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Commerce, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A7, Canada
关键词
distortion; decision criteria; justification; going concern decisions;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00015-8
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The results of two experiments indicate that decision-makers separately distort their interpretations of decision criteria and evaluations of information in a manner that justifies their decisions. In Study 1, participants reported a yes/no decision either before or after they rated the applicable decision criterion and problem information. Participants distorted their criterion and information ratings more when they reported their decisions before, rather than after, they rated the decision criterion and problem information. Study 2 demonstrated that distortion of decision criterion ratings occurred after a decision had been made whereas distortion of information evaluations occurred during the process of reaching a decision. These results are consistent with a two-stage model of decision-making in which the distortion of decision criteria is distinct from the distortion of decision information. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 784
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   ROLE OF EXPECTANCY TIMING AND OUTCOME CONSISTENCY IN EXPECTANCY-GUIDED RETRIEVAL [J].
HIRT, ER ;
ERICKSON, GA ;
MCDONALD, HE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (04) :640-656
[12]   Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction [J].
Holyoak, KJ ;
Simon, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1999, 128 (01) :3-31
[13]   ELASTIC JUSTIFICATION - HOW TEMPTING BUT TASK-IRRELEVANT FACTORS INFLUENCE DECISIONS [J].
HSEE, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 62 (03) :330-337
[14]   Elastic justification: How unjustifiable factors influence judgments [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 66 (01) :122-129
[15]   Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues [J].
Kardash, CM ;
Scholes, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (02) :260-271
[16]   GUILT BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT - EFFECTS OF CONCEPT DEFINITION AND ASSIGNED DECISION RULE ON JUDGMENTS OF MOCK JURORS [J].
KERR, NL ;
ATKIN, RS ;
STASSER, G ;
MEEK, D ;
HOLT, RW ;
DAVIS, JH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 34 (02) :282-294
[17]   SEVERITY OF PRESCRIBED PENALTY AND MOCK JURORS VERDICTS [J].
KERR, NL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (12) :1431-1442
[18]   Self-serving influences on adolescents' evaluations of belief-relevant evidence [J].
Klaczynski, PA ;
Gordon, DH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 62 (03) :317-339
[19]  
Klaczynski PA, 1997, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V89, P470
[20]  
Kuhn D., 1991, SKILLS ARGUMENT