Variation in calibration of hand-held ultraviolet (UV) meters for psoralen plus UVA and narrow-band UVB phototherapy

被引:6
作者
Lloyd, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Victoria Infirm, Dept Reg Med Phys, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
calibration; meter; phototherapy; psoralen plus ultraviolet A; TL-01; ultraviolet B;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05981.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Phototherapy units should regularly use hand-held ultraviolet (UV) meters to assess the output of treatment lamps, and these meters should be accurately calibrated. Several medical physics departments in the U.K. can calibrate UV meters traceable to national standards, but there is concern that there may be disagreement among departments. In particular, there may be difficulty in calibration for narrow-band UVB phototherapy lamps (TL-01). Objectives To ascertain the level of agreement in UV meter calibration at expert centres in the U.K., and to survey methodology at these centres, consider sources of errors and to make recommendations on calibration methods. Methods The same UV meter with two detectors (for UVA and UVB) was calibrated by seven medical physics departments. A questionnaire on methods was also distributed and measured spectral outputs from each centre were examined. Results The calibration factors for the meter varied by +/- 18% for the UVA detector and by +/-60% for the UVB detector (2 standard deviations). Six centres performed calibration using a spectroradiometer and one centre used a reference meter method. The spectra of lamps used for calibration were similar. For the spectroradiometric methods there were some differences in methodology and instrumentation that may account for the differences in calibration factors. Conclusions UV meter calibration in the U.K. shows unacceptable variability, particularly for TL-01 lamps. An accuracy of around of +/- 10% would be clinically acceptable and should be technically achievable.
引用
收藏
页码:1162 / 1166
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Traceable calibration of ultraviolet meters used with broadband, extended sources [J].
Coleman, AJ ;
Collins, M ;
Saunders, JE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (01) :185-196
[2]   Similar dose-response and persistence of erythema with broad-band and narrow-band ultraviolet B lamps [J].
Das, S ;
Lloyd, JJ ;
Farr, PM .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 117 (05) :1318-1321
[3]  
Diffey B, 1997, ULTRAVIOLET BLUE LIG
[4]   STATUS OF ULTRAVIOLET-A DOSIMETRY IN METHOXSALEN PLUS ULTRAVIOLET-A THERAPY [J].
DIFFEY, BL ;
ROELANDTS, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1986, 15 (06) :1209-1213
[5]   SURVEY OF THE ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION EMISSIONS OF PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY UNITS [J].
DIFFEY, BL ;
CHALLONER, AVJ ;
KEY, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1980, 102 (03) :301-306
[6]  
FARR PM, 1996, FUNDAMENTAL BASES PH, P133
[7]  
GARDINER B, 1995, SETTING STANDARDS EU
[8]   National measurement scales for ultraviolet radiation: Their agreement and future development at NPL [J].
Lambe, R .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2000, 91 (1-3) :129-131
[9]   A study of the directional response of ultraviolet radiometers: II. Implications for ultraviolet phototherapy derived from computer simulations [J].
Martin, CJ ;
Pye, SD .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (09) :2713-2729
[10]  
Moore J. R., 1980, Lighting Research and Technology, V12, P213