Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy

被引:49
作者
Aghaei, Faranak [1 ]
Tan, Maxine [1 ]
Hollingsworth, Alan B. [2 ]
Qian, Wei [3 ]
Liu, Hong [1 ]
Zheng, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Mercy Hlth Ctr, Mercy Womens Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK 73120 USA
[3] Univ Texas El Paso, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging; tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; quantitative image feature analysis; assessment of breast cancer prognosis; CANCER-SOCIETY GUIDELINES; ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1118/1.4933198
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify a new clinical marker based on quantitative kinetic image features analysis and assess its feasibility to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The authors assembled a dataset involving breast MR images acquired from 68 cancer patients before undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 25 patients had complete response (CR) and 43 had partial and nonresponse (NR) to chemotherapy based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. The authors developed a computer-aided detection scheme to segment breast areas and tumors depicted on the breast MR images and computed a total of 39 kinetic image features from both tumor and background parenchymal enhancement regions. The authors then applied and tested two approaches to classify between CR and NR cases. The first one analyzed each individual feature and applied a simple feature fusion method that combines classification results from multiple features. The second approach tested an attribute selected classifier that integrates an artificial neural network (ANN) with a wrapper subset evaluator, which was optimized using a leave-one-case-out validation method. Results: In the pool of 39 features, 10 yielded relatively higher classification performance with the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 to classify between CR and NR cases. Using a feature fusion method, the maximum AUC = 0.85 +/- 0.05. Using the ANN-based classifier, AUC value significantly increased to 0.96 +/- 0.03 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that quantitative analysis of kinetic image features computed from breast MR images acquired prechemotherapy has potential to generate a useful clinical marker in predicting tumor response to chemotherapy. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:6520 / 6528
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer [J].
Ahmed, Arfan ;
Gibbs, Peter ;
Pickles, Martin ;
Turnbull, Lindsay .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (01) :89-101
[2]   More Mammography Muddle: Emotions, Politics, Science, Costs, and Polarization [J].
Berlin, Leonard ;
Hall, Ferris M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (02) :311-316
[3]   Computerized breast lesions detection using kinetic and morphologic analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [J].
Chang, Yeun-Chung ;
Huang, Yan-Hao ;
Huang, Chiun-Sheng ;
Chen, Jeon-Hor ;
Chang, Ruey-Feng .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (05) :514-522
[4]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[5]   Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: Investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics [J].
Chen, WJ ;
Giger, ML ;
Lan, L ;
Bick, U .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (05) :1076-1082
[6]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[7]   Reality check: Perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers [J].
Fenton, JJ ;
Egger, J ;
Carney, PA ;
Cutter, G ;
D'Orsi, C ;
Sickles, EA ;
Fosse, J ;
Abraham, L ;
Taplin, SH ;
Barlow, W ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Elmore, JG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (01) :42-46
[8]   Current Approaches and Challenges in Monitoring Treatment Responses in Breast Cancer [J].
Graham, Lindsey J. ;
Shupe, Matthew P. ;
Schneble, Erika J. ;
Flynt, Frederick L. ;
Clemenshaw, Michael N. ;
Kirkpatrick, Aaron D. ;
Gallagher, Chris ;
Nissan, Aviram ;
Henry, Leonard ;
Stojadinovic, Alexander ;
Peoples, George E. ;
Shumway, Nathan M. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 5 (01) :58-68
[9]  
Jemal A, 2010, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V60, P277, DOI [10.3322/caac.21254, 10.3322/caac.20073]
[10]   Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis [J].
Karahaliou, A. ;
Vassiou, K. ;
Arikidis, N. S. ;
Skiadopoulos, S. ;
Kanavou, T. ;
Costaridou, L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (988) :296-306