Improved methods of assessing proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy

被引:104
作者
Saudan, PJ
Brown, MA
Farrell, T
Shaw, L
机构
[1] UNIV NEW S WALES, DEPT RENAL MED, ST GEORGE HOSP, KOGARAH, NSW 2217, AUSTRALIA
[2] UNIV NEW S WALES, DEPT MED, ST GEORGE HOSP, KOGARAH, NSW 2217, AUSTRALIA
[3] UNIV NEW S WALES, DEPT OBSTET, ST GEORGE HOSP, KOGARAH, NSW 2217, AUSTRALIA
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1997年 / 104卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10940.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether use of an automated urinalysis device will improve the accuracy of detecting proteinuria, and whether spot urine protein to creatinine ratio will provide accurate quantitation of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnant women. Design Prospective studies assessing the accuracy of both detection and quantitation of proteinuria. Setting Antenatal ward and pregnancy day assessment unit of St George Hospital, a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Population Hypertensive pregnant women admitted to hospital or day assessment unit for management of their hypertensive disorders. Methods 1. Routine dipstick urinalysis and 2. urinalysis by an automated device (Clinitek 100 Ames) on a midstream urine sample were compared with measurement of protein concentration on that sample (n = 103). In a third study, the protein:creatinine ratio on a midstream (spot) urine sample was compared with protein excretion over the subsequent 24 hours (n = 100). Main outcome measures Relations between urine protein concentrations and 1. dipstick urinalysis and 2. automated urinalysis; 3. Positive and negative predictive values of spot protein:creatinine ratio for true proteinuria (greater than or equal to 300 mgiday). Results Automated urinalysis improved the percentage of true positive urinalyses from 48% with visual urinalysis to 74% (P = 0.02). True negatives were 98% to 100% for both methods. Spot urine protein:creatinine ratio correlated well with subsequent 24-hour urine proteinuria (r = 0.93, P < 0.001). A protein:creatinine ratio > 30 mg protein/mmol creatinine was the optimum discriminant value for true proteinuria, with sensitivity 93%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 95% and negative predictive value 90%. Conclusions Use of an automated urinalysis device improved accurate detection of proteinuria, particularly reducing false positive tests. A random urine protein:creatinine ratio provides an accurate and rapid quantitation of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnant women. This should improve clinical care, especially when managing hypertensive pregnant women as outpatients.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1164
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V163, P1691
[2]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[3]   INADEQUACY OF DIPSTICK PROTEINURIA IN HYPERTENSIVE PREGNANCY [J].
BROWN, MA ;
BUDDLE, ML .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 35 (04) :366-369
[4]   THE IMPORTANCE OF NONPROTEINURIC HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY [J].
BROWN, MA ;
BUDDLE, ML .
HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 1995, 14 (01) :57-65
[5]  
CHUA S, 1988, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V29, P121
[6]   THE CLASSIFICATION AND DEFINITION OF THE HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY [J].
DAVEY, DA ;
MACGILLIVRAY, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (04) :892-898
[7]   COMPARISON OF AUTOMATED AND MANUAL METHODS FOR URINALYSIS [J].
ELIN, RJ ;
HOSSEINI, JM ;
KESTNER, J ;
RAWE, M ;
RUDDEL, M ;
NISHI, HH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1986, 86 (06) :731-737
[8]   PROTEINURIA AND OUTCOME OF 444 PREGNANCIES COMPLICATED BY HYPERTENSION [J].
FERRAZZANI, S ;
CARUSO, A ;
DECAROLIS, S ;
MARTINO, IV ;
MANCUSO, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (02) :366-371
[9]   USE OF SINGLE VOIDED URINE SAMPLES TO ESTIMATE QUANTITATIVE PROTEINURIA [J].
GINSBERG, JM ;
CHANG, BS ;
MATARESE, RA ;
GARELLA, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (25) :1543-1546
[10]  
JASCHEVATZKY OE, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V75, P604