Quantum mechanical characterization of nucleic acids in solution: A linear-scaling study of charge fluctuations in DNA and RNA

被引:15
作者
Khandogin, J [1 ]
York, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Chem, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jp0146667
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Atom-centered point charges are a convenient and computationally efficient way to approximately represent the electrostatic properties of biological macromolecules. Atomic charges are routinely used in molecular modeling applications such as molecular simulations, molecular recognition, and ligand binding studies and for determining quantitative structure activity relationships. In the present paper a divide-and-conquer linear-scaling semiempirical method combined with a conductor-like screening model is applied to the calculation of charge distributions of solvated DNA and RNA duplexes in canonical A- and B-forms. The atomic charges on A-DNA, B-DNA, and A-RNA duplex decamers are analyzed to characterize the convergence of the linear-scaling method, and the effects of the charge model and semiempirical Hamiltonian. Furthermore, the inter- and intramolecular charge variations on DNA and RNA duplex 72-mers are investigated to gain insight into the influence of conformation, base stacking, and solvent polarization on the charge distributions. The charges derived from the linear-scaling semiempirical calculations reflect the electronic relaxation in the solvated macromolecular environment and therefore provide a better reference charge state for biomolecular modeling applications.
引用
收藏
页码:7693 / 7703
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[21]   Global 3D-QSAR methods: MS-WHIM and autocorrelation [J].
Gancia, E ;
Bravi, G ;
Mascagni, P ;
Zaliani, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2000, 14 (03) :293-306
[22]   The use of atomic charges and orbital energies as hydrogen-bonding-donor parameters for QSAR studies: Comparison of MNDO, AM1 and PM13 methods [J].
Ghafourian, T ;
Dearden, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 52 (06) :603-610
[23]   THEORY OF ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS IN MACROMOLECULES [J].
GILSON, MK .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1995, 5 (02) :216-223
[24]   Linear scaling electronic structure methods [J].
Goedecker, S .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1999, 71 (04) :1085-1123
[25]   EFFICIENT LINEAR SCALING ALGORITHM FOR TIGHT-BINDING MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS [J].
GOEDECKER, S ;
COLOMBO, L .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1994, 73 (01) :122-125
[26]   TIGHT-BINDING ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS AND TIGHT-BINDING MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS WITH LOCALIZED ORBITALS [J].
GOEDECKER, S ;
TETER, M .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1995, 51 (15) :9455-9464
[27]   Fully quantum mechanical description of proteins in solution. Combining linear scaling quantum mechanical methodologies with the Poisson-Boltzmann equation [J].
Gogonea, V ;
Merz, KM .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1999, 103 (26) :5171-5188
[28]   New developments in applying quantum mechanics to proteins [J].
Gogonea, V ;
Suárez, D ;
van der Vaart, A ;
Merz, KW .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (02) :217-223
[29]   Electrostatic potentials in Rhodopseudomonas viridis reaction centers: Implications for the driving force and directionality of electron transfer [J].
Gunner, MR ;
Nicholls, A ;
Honig, B .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 100 (10) :4277-4291
[30]   Polarizable force fields [J].
Halgren, TA ;
Damm, W .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (02) :236-242