CBF changes during brain activation: fMRI vs. PET

被引:72
作者
Feng, CM
Narayana, S
Lancaster, JL
Jerabek, PA
Arnow, TL
Zhu, F
Tan, LH
Fox, PT
Gao, JH
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Res Imaging Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Labs Language & Cognit Neurosci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
brain activation; PET; cerebral blood flow;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.017
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) associated with the changes in neuronal activity are routinely measured both by positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques. However, direct comparison has not been performed to determine similarities and differences of PET and fMRI techniques in determining the rCBF response to brain activation. In the present study, a quantitative comparison of the functional rCBF maps obtained by PET and fMRI are made by performing an activation study in a single group of subjects under precisely controlled conditions and using identical visual stimuli. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in the activation study using the visual checkerboard stimulation with flip frequency at 8 Hz. By selecting the conjunctive pixels which activated on both PET and fMRI maps, the change in rCBF measured by fMRI was 36.95 +/- 2.54%, whereas the value measured by PET was 38.79 +/- 2.63%. Our results have demonstrated that there is no statistically significant difference (P = 0.22) in the measurements of rCBF change between MRI and PET methods. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 446
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance, reproducibility of the method, and comparison with H215O positron emission tomography [J].
Carroll, TJ ;
Teneggi, V ;
Jobin, M ;
Squassante, L ;
Treyer, V ;
Hany, TF ;
Burger, C ;
Wang, L ;
Bye, T ;
von Schulthess, GK ;
Buck, A .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 2002, 22 (09) :1149-1156
[2]   PERFUSION IMAGING [J].
DETRE, JA ;
LEIGH, JS ;
WILLIAMS, DS ;
KORETSKY, AP .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 23 (01) :37-45
[3]  
HERSCOVITCH P, 1983, J NUCL MED, V24, P782
[4]  
KETY SS, 1951, PHARMACOL REV, V3, P1
[5]   QUANTIFICATION OF RELATIVE CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW CHANGE BY FLOW-SENSITIVE ALTERNATING INVERSION-RECOVERY (FAIR) TECHNIQUE - APPLICATION TO FUNCTIONAL MAPPING [J].
KIM, SG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (03) :293-301
[6]  
Lancaster JL, 1999, J NUCL MED, V40, P942
[7]   Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion: A PET and MR study [J].
Lin, W ;
Celik, A ;
Derdeyn, C ;
An, H ;
Lee, Y ;
Videen, T ;
Ostergaard, L ;
Powers, WJ .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 14 (06) :659-667
[8]  
Liu HL, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V45, P431, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200103)45:3<431::AID-MRM1056>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-E
[10]  
MINTUN MA, 1984, J NUCL MED, V25, P177