Comparison and combination of different models for optimal landslide susceptibility zonation

被引:18
作者
Chen, Guan [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Xingmin [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Long [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Fanyu [3 ]
Qiao, Liang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Educ, Key Lab Western Chinas Environm Syst, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Res Sch Arid Environm & Climate Change, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Mech, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; RESOLUTION ENSEMBLE PREDICTION; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; CONDITIONAL-PROBABILITY; WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE; WESTERN COLORADO; FREQUENCY RATIO;
D O I
10.1144/qjegh2013-071
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
It is important to compare different methods and apply combined models for landslide susceptibility zonation on a regional scale for land-use planning and hazard mitigation. The purpose of this study is attempt to obtain an optimal landslide susceptibility zonation in a severely landslide affected region where the available data are very limited. Six single models (analytical hierarchy process (AHP), logistic regression (LR), fuzzy logic (FL), weight of evidence integrated logistic regression (WL), artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM)), were applied to obtain the single landslide susceptibility zonations along the middle reaches of the Bailong River from Zhouqu to Wudu, southern Gansu, China, then these single models were compared, after which the three single models that performed better (LR, ANN and SVM) were selected to prepare the combined zonations. Six conditional independent environmental factors were selected as the explanatory variables that contribute to landslide occurrence (elevation, slope, aspect, distance from fault, lithology and settlement density). The mapped landslides in this region were randomly partitioned into two sets: 80% of the landslides were used for the model training and the remaining 20% were used for validation of the models. Receiver operating characteristic and cost curves were plotted as means of evaluating the quality of the susceptibility zonations for the single and combined models. Results show that the single LR, ANN and SVM are models with superior prediction performance and are more suitable for constructing the combined models in this study. Compared with single models, the combined models provided an improved prediction capability and reduced uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 306
页数:24
相关论文
共 86 条
[21]   Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya [J].
Devkota, Krishna Chandra ;
Regmi, Amar Deep ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Yoshida, Kohki ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Ryu, In Chang ;
Dhital, Megh Raj ;
Althuwaynee, Omar F. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 65 (01) :135-165
[22]   Combining spatial data in landslide reactivation susceptibility mapping: A likelihood ratio-based approach in W Belgium [J].
Dewitte, Olivier ;
Chung, Chang-Jo ;
Cornet, Yves ;
Daoudi, Mohamed ;
Demoulin, Alain .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 122 (1-2) :153-166
[23]   Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models [J].
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Lofman, Owe ;
Revhaug, Inge ;
Dick, Oystein B. .
CATENA, 2012, 96 :28-40
[24]   THE LOESS OF NORTH-CENTRAL CHINA - GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES AND THEIR RELATION TO SLOPE STABILITY [J].
DIJKSTRA, TA ;
ROGERS, CDF ;
SMALLEY, IJ ;
DERBYSHIRE, E ;
JIN, LY ;
MIN, MX .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1994, 36 (3-4) :153-171
[25]   Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey [J].
Duman, T. Y. ;
Can, T. ;
Gokceoglu, C. ;
Nefeslioglu, H. A. ;
Sonmez, H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2006, 51 (02) :241-256
[26]   Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study [J].
Felicisimo, Angel ;
Cuartero, Aurora ;
Remondo, Juan ;
Quiros, Elia .
LANDSLIDES, 2013, 10 (02) :175-189
[27]  
Fell R, 2008, ENG GEOL, V102, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.014
[28]   Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models [J].
Frattini, Paolo ;
Crosta, Giovanni ;
Carrara, Alberto .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2010, 111 (1-4) :62-72
[29]   Selecting and weighting spatial predictors for empirical modeling of landslide susceptibility in the Darjeeling Himalayas (India) [J].
Ghosh, Saibal ;
Carranza, Emmanuel John M. ;
van Westen, Cees J. ;
Jetten, Victor G. ;
Bhattacharya, Dipendra N. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2011, 131 (1-2) :35-56
[30]  
Glade T., 2005, Landslide hazard and risk. Part 3, P75, DOI [10.1002/9780470012659, DOI 10.1002/9780470012659]