Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability

被引:96
作者
Fleishman, JA
Spector, WD
Altman, BM
机构
[1] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Ctr Cost & Financing Studies, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2002年 / 57卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/geronb/57.5.S275
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives, Estimates of group differences in functional disability may be biased if items exhibit differential item functioning (DIF). For a given item. DIF exists if persons in different groups do not have the same probability of responding, given their level of disability. This Study examines the extent to which DIF affects estimates of age and gender group differences in disability severity among adults with some functional disability. Methods. Data came from the 1994/1995 National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement. Analyses focused on 5,750 adult respondents who received help or supervision with at least one of 11 activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living tasks. We estimated gender and age group (18-39, 40-69, and 70+) differences in disability, using multiple-indicator/multiple-cause models, which treat functional disability as a latent trait. Results. Nine items manifested significant DIF by age or gender DIF was especially large for "shopping" and "money management." Without adjusting for DIF, middle-aged persons were less disabled than elderly men, and women were less disabled than men among nonelderly persons. After adjusting for DIF, middle-aged persons did not differ from elderly persons, and gender differences within age groups were not significant. Discussion. Comparisons of disability across sociodemographic groups need to take DIF into account. Future research Should examine the causes of DIF and develop alternative question wordings that reduce DIF effects.
引用
收藏
页码:S275 / S284
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life [J].
Groot, W .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (03) :403-420
[12]  
Hambleton R., 1991, FUNDAMENTALS ITEM RE
[13]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[14]   STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED - THE INDEX OF ADL - A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION [J].
KATZ, S ;
FORD, AB ;
MOSKOWITZ, RW ;
JACKSON, BA ;
JAFFE, MW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1963, 185 (12) :914-919
[15]   The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties [J].
Kempen, GIJM ;
Miedema, I ;
Ormel, J ;
Molenaar, W .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1996, 43 (11) :1601-1610
[16]   ASSESSMENT OF OLDER PEOPLE - SELF-MAINTAINING AND INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING [J].
LAWTON, MP ;
BRODY, EM .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1969, 9 (3P1) :179-&
[17]  
Lord FM., 1980, Application of item response theory to practical testing problems
[18]  
MAHONEY F I, 1965, Md State Med J, V14, P61
[19]   Differential item functioning in the mini-mental state examination in English- and Spanish-speaking older adults [J].
Marshall, SC ;
Mungas, D ;
Weldon, M ;
Reed, B ;
Haan, M .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1997, 12 (04) :718-725
[20]   METHODOLOGY REVIEW - STATISTICAL APPROACHES FOR ASSESSING MEASUREMENT BIAS [J].
MILLSAP, RE ;
EVERSON, HT .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 17 (04) :297-334