Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system

被引:40
作者
Bloomquist, Aili K. [1 ]
Yaffe, Martin J.
Mawdsley, Gordon E.
Hunter, David M.
Beideck, Daniel J.
机构
[1] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Vermont, Fletcher Allan Hlth Ctr, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
关键词
selenium; lag; ghosting; digital mammography;
D O I
10.1118/1.2218315
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We present measurements of lag and ghosting in a FDA-approved digital mammography system that uses a dielectric/selenium based detector structure. Lag is the carryover of signal from a previous image, whereas ghosting is the reduction of sensitivity caused by previous exposure history of the detector. Data from six selenium units were acquired. For the type of selenium detector tested, and under typical clinical usage conditions, the lag was as high as 0.15% of source signal and the ghosting could be as high as 15%. The amount of lag and ghosting varied from unit to unit. Results were compared with data acquired on a phosphor-based full-field digital mammography system. Modifications in the technology of the selenium detectors appear to have resulted in a marked decrease in both lag and ghosting effects in more recent systems. (C) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2998 / 3005
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience [J].
Jong, RA ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Skarpathiotakis, M ;
Shumak, RS ;
Danjoux, NM ;
Gunesekara, A ;
Plewes, DB .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) :842-850
[2]  
LEE DL, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2432, P237, DOI 10.1117/12.208342
[3]   Direct-conversion X-ray imaging detectors for medical, non-destructive testing (NDT), and other applications [J].
Lee, DLY ;
Golden, KP ;
Yorker, JG ;
Rodricks, BG ;
Cheung, LK ;
Jeromin, LS .
PENETRATING RADIATION SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS III, 2001, 4508 :1-14
[4]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: Feasibility [J].
Lewin, JM ;
Isaacs, PK ;
Vance, V ;
Larke, FJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :261-268
[5]   Digital Tomosynthesis in breast imaging [J].
Niklason, LT ;
Christian, BT ;
Niklason, LE ;
Kopans, DB ;
Castleberry, DE ;
OpsahlOng, BH ;
Landberg, CE ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Giardino, AA ;
Moore, R ;
Albagli, D ;
DeJule, MC ;
Fitzgerald, PF ;
Fobare, DF ;
Giambattista, BW ;
Kwasnick, RF ;
Liu, JQ ;
Lubowski, SJ ;
Possin, GE ;
Richotte, JF ;
Wei, CY ;
Wirth, RF .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) :399-406
[6]   American College of Radiology imaging network digital mammographic Imaging screening trial: Objectives and methodology [J].
Pisano, ED ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Tosteson, ANA ;
Fryback, DG ;
Bassett, LW ;
Baum, JK ;
Conant, EF ;
Jong, RA ;
Rebner, M ;
D'Orsi, CJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) :404-412
[7]   DEEP TRAPPING AND RECOMBINATION IN A-SE-AS X-RAY SENSITIVE PHOTORECEPTORS [J].
SCHIEBEL, U ;
BUCHKREMER, T ;
FRINGS, G ;
QUADFLIEG, P .
JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, 1989, 115 (1-3) :216-218
[8]   A ghost story: Spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager [J].
Siewerdsen, JH ;
Jaffray, DA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) :1624-1641
[9]   Community perceptions of adequate levels and reasons for skin protection [J].
Stanton, WR ;
Moffatt, J ;
Clavarino, A .
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (01) :5-15
[10]   Sensitivity reduction in biased amorphous selenium photoconductors [J].
Steciw, S ;
Stanescu, T ;
Rathee, S ;
Fallone, BG .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2002, 35 (21) :2716-2722