Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy

被引:169
作者
Molly, Liene
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Periodontol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
bone implant interface; bone regeneration; clinical assessment; diagnosis; guided tissue regeneration; morphometric analysis; structural biology; tissue physiology;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01356.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Introduction: To improve patient comfort, deviations from the very successful standard osseointegration protocol are being developed. To keep implant failure rates as low as possible, the most perfect treatment planning and a good patient selection are extremely important. Because bone density plays an important role in implant outcome, known relations of bone density could improve treatment planning. Material and methods: A Pubmed search revealed 66 manuscripts investigating and discussing bone density of human jawbone whether or not related to implant stability or outcome. Forty-five of these will be discussed in this review. Results and discussion: Many pre-operative methods of jawbone density assessment are available. Most of those techniques correlate well with one another. Some are more elaborate to use in clinical practice. Primary stability measurements show significant correlations with different bone densities and also with implant outcome; however, not many studies investigate both at the same time. Conclusion: To investigate the outcome of adaptation methods of the surgical protocol with regard to the jawbone density, an objective pre-surgical determination of bone density is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 135
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
Aparicio C, 1997, INT J PERIODONT REST, V17, P151
[2]
APARICIO C, 2006, IN PRESS CLIN ORAL I
[3]
Aranyarachkul P, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P416
[4]
Astrand Per, 2003, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V5, P213, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00203.x
[5]
Barewal RM, 2003, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V18, P641
[6]
The effects of preoperative resorption and jaw anatomy on implant success. A report of 303 cases [J].
Bass, S. L. ;
Triplett, R. G. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1991, 2 (04) :193-198
[7]
Osteoporosis and implant failure: An exploratory case-control study [J].
Becker, W ;
Hujoel, PP ;
Becker, BE ;
Willingham, H .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (04) :625-631
[8]
Calandriello Roberto, 2003, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V5 Suppl 1, P74, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00018.x
[9]
Assessing mineral density in small trephined jawbone biopsy specimens [J].
Denissen, H ;
Eijsink-Smeets, R ;
van Lingen, A ;
van Waas, R .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (04) :320-325
[10]
Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology [J].
Esposito, M ;
Hirsch, JM ;
Lekholm, U ;
Thomsen, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1998, 106 (01) :527-551