Does class size in first grade relate to children's academic and social performance or observed classroom processes?

被引:55
作者
Belsky, J [1 ]
Booth-LaForce, CL [1 ]
Bradley, R [1 ]
Brownell, CA [1 ]
Campbell, SB [1 ]
Clarke-Stewart, KA [1 ]
Cox, M [1 ]
Friedman, SL [1 ]
Hirsh-Pasck, K [1 ]
Houts, RM [1 ]
Huston, A [1 ]
Jaeger, E [1 ]
Johnson, DJ [1 ]
Kelly, JF [1 ]
Knoke, B [1 ]
Marshall, N [1 ]
McCartney, K [1 ]
Morrison, FJ [1 ]
O'Brien, M [1 ]
Owen, MT [1 ]
Payne, C [1 ]
Phillips, D [1 ]
Pianta, R [1 ]
Randolph, SM [1 ]
Robeson, WW [1 ]
Spieker, S [1 ]
Vandell, DL [1 ]
Weinraub, M [1 ]
机构
[1] NICHD, Early Child Care Res Network, Ctr Res Mothers & Children, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.651
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the extent to which first-grade class size predicted child outcomes and observed classroom processes for 651 children (in separate classrooms). Analyses examined observed child-adult ratios and teacher-reported class sizes. Smaller classrooms showed higher quality instructional and emotional support, although children were somewhat less likely to be engaged. Teachers in smaller classes rated typical children in those classes as more socially skilled and as showing less externalizing behavior and reported more closeness toward them. Children in smaller classes performed better on literacy skills. Larger classrooms showed more group activities directed by the teacher, teachers and children interacted more often, and children were more often engaged. Lower class sizes were not of more benefit (or harm) as a function of the child's family income. First-grade class size in the range typical of present-day classrooms in the United States predicts classroom social and instructional processes as well as relative changes in social and literacy outcomes from kindergarten to first grade.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 664
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, STUDENT TEACHER ACHI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, MANUAL TEACHER REPOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
[4]  
Betts JR, 1999, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V21, P193, DOI 10.3102/01623737021002193
[5]   A systematic observational study of teachers' and pupils' behaviour in large and small classes [J].
Blatchford, P .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2003, 13 (06) :569-595
[6]   Relationships between class size and teaching: A multimethod analysis of English infant schools [J].
Blatchford, P ;
Moriarty, V ;
Edmonds, S ;
Martin, C .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2002, 39 (01) :101-132
[7]   A study of class size effects in English school reception year classes [J].
Blatchford, P ;
Goldstein, H ;
Martin, C ;
Browne, W .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2002, 28 (02) :169-185
[8]  
Blatchford Peter, 2003, The class size debate: is small better?
[9]  
*CLASS SIZ RED RES, 2001, CLASS SIZ RED CAL 19
[10]  
Eccles J. S., 1998, DEV PSYCHOL ADV TXB, P503