Negative psychological effects of selection methods: Construct formulation and an empirical investigation into an assessment center

被引:18
作者
Anderson, Neil [1 ]
Goltsi, Vicki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00344.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This paper defines and formulates the construct of negative psychological effects (NPEs) of selection and assessment methods upon applicants. The results of an empirical study into NPEs in an operational assessment center are also reported. Applicants (n=107) completed measures at three timepoints: Time 1 (just before the AC), Time 2 (immediately after the AC but before outcome decisions were known), and Time 3 (6 months after the AC). Both accepted and rejected candidates completed all three measures, which included self-esteem, mental health, positive and negative affect, and career exploration behavior. No evidence of NPEs was found for rejected candidates despite significant between-group differences on feedback reactions level items. Interestingly, well-being and positive affect declined slightly for successful candidates at subsequent measurement compared against baseline Time 1 norms. Reactions level outcomes did, however, differ significantly between accepted and rejected candidates, with the latter rating feedback dimensions far less favorably. These results are discussed in relation to future research into the psychological impact of selection procedures upon candidates and the need for applied psychologists and HR practitioners to demonstrate that assessment methods do not exhibit NPEs upon applicants.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 255
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]  
IMUS AL, 2005, HDB SELECTION, P280
[22]   Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Judge, TA ;
Bono, JE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (01) :80-92
[23]   Applicant perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety [J].
Lievens, F ;
De Corte, W ;
Brysse, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 11 (01) :67-77
[24]  
LIEVENS F, 2001, INT REV IND ORG PSYC, V16, P245
[25]   ATTITUDES TOWARD EMPLOYMENT TESTING - SCALE DEVELOPMENT, CORRELATES, AND KNOWN-GROUP VALIDATION [J].
LOUNSBURY, JW ;
BOBROW, W ;
JENSEN, JB .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1989, 20 (05) :340-349
[26]   THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTS REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT-CENTER [J].
MACAN, TH ;
AVEDON, MJ ;
PAESE, M ;
SMITH, DE .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (04) :715-738
[27]   Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [J].
Mittal, Vijay A. ;
Walker, Elaine F. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) :158-159
[28]   THE INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ASSESSMENT-CENTER EVALUATION ON CAREER EXPLORATION BEHAVIOR AND JOB INVOLVEMENT [J].
NOE, RA ;
STEFFY, BD .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1987, 30 (02) :187-202
[29]   Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data [J].
Ones, DS ;
Anderson, N .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 75 :255-276
[30]   Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks [J].
Ployhart, RE ;
Ryan, AM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 72 (03) :308-335