Fragrance allergy: assessing the risk from washed fabrics

被引:22
作者
Corea, Namali V.
Basketter, David A.
Clapp, Catherine
Van Asten, Arian
Marty, Jean-Paul
Pons-Guiraud, Annick
Laverdet, Catherine
机构
[1] Unilever, Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
[2] Unilever Res Labs, Perfume Enzyme & Analyt Knowledge Ctr, NL-3130 AC Vlaardingen, South Holland, Netherlands
[3] Fac Pharm Chatenay Malabry, F-92296 Chatenay Malabry, France
关键词
fabric washing; fragrance allergy; induction thresholds; risk assessment; skin sensitization;
D O I
10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00872.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance ingredients increased during the last part of the 20th century with the consequence that a substantial number of individuals are at risk of experiencing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) if they have a sufficient degree of skin exposure to the chemical to which they have become sensitized. Such exposure does not necessarily have to arise from the type of source that originally induced the sensitization. A number of sources of exposure are clearly associated with risk of elicitation of ACD, but the role of fragrance deposited on fabrics, for example as a result of laundry processes, also can be questioned. In this article, firstly, the risk of the induction of fragrance-related ACD from exposure to fragrance via fabric is considered. Using a quantitative risk-assessment approach, the risk appears to be extremely low. The possibility that fragrance residues on laundered fabrics might elicit reactions in those already sensitized by a different route is also discussed. Clinically, clothing pattern dermatitis associated with fragrance allergy is almost never observed, although this could be investigated clinically by exposing sensitized individuals to the relevant fragrance allergen.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 53
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Clapp, C ;
Jefferies, D ;
Safford, B ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, F ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 53 (05) :260-267
[2]   Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Andersen, KE ;
Liden, C ;
van Loveren, H ;
Boman, A ;
Kimber, I ;
Alanko, K ;
Berggren, E .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (01) :39-43
[3]   Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products:: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Angelini, G ;
Ingber, A ;
Kern, PS ;
Menné, T .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 49 (01) :1-7
[4]  
BASKETTER DA, 2005, ENV DERMATOL, V12, P178
[5]   A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid when used as fragrance ingredients [J].
Bickers, D ;
Calow, P ;
Greim, H ;
Hanifin, JM ;
Rogers, AE ;
Saurat, JH ;
Sipes, IG ;
Smith, RL ;
Tagami, H .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 43 (06) :799-836
[6]   The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period [J].
Buckley, DA ;
Wakelin, SH ;
Seed, PT ;
Holloway, D ;
Rycroft, RJG ;
White, IR ;
McFadden, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 142 (02) :279-283
[7]   Fragrance as an occupational allergen [J].
Buckley, DA ;
Rycroft, RJG ;
White, IR ;
McFadden, JP .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2002, 52 (01) :13-16
[8]  
CHESNAIS E, 2005, QUE CHOISIR, V424, P26
[9]   A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis [J].
Felter, SP ;
Robinson, MK ;
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 47 (05) :257-266
[10]   Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach [J].
Gerberick, GF ;
Robinson, MK ;
Felter, SP ;
White, IR ;
Basketter, DA .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 45 (06) :333-340