Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the anal canal: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT

被引:168
作者
Clivio, Alessandro
Fogliata, Antonella
Franzetti-Pellanda, Alessandra
Nicolini, Giorgia
Vanetti, Eugenio
Wyttenbach, Rolf [2 ,3 ]
Cozzi, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Phys Unit, CH-6504 Bellinzona, Switzerland
[2] Osped San Giovanni Bellinzona, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
RapidArc; IMRT; Anal canal radiation therapy; Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; RADIATION-THERAPY IMRT; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; INTENSITY MODULATION; CANCER; IMAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A treatment planning study was performed to compare volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy against conventional fixed field IMRT. Materials and methods: CT datasets of 10 patients affected by carcinoma of the anal canal were included and five plans were generated for each case: fixed beam IMRT, single (RA1)- and double (RA2)-modulated arcs with the RapidArc technique. Dose prescription was set according to a simultaneous integrated boost strategy to 59.4 Gy to the primary tumour PTVI (at 1.8 Gy/fraction) and to 49.5 Gy to risk area including inguinal nodes, PTVII. Planning objectives for PTV were minimum dose >95%, maximum dose < 107%; for organs at risk (OARs): bladder (mean < 45 Gy, D-2% < 56 Gy, D-30% < 35 Gy), femurs (D-2% < 47 Gy), small bowel (mean < 30 Gy, D2% < 56 Gy). MU and delivery time scored treatment efficiency. Results: All techniques fulfilled objectives on maximum dose. Some deviations were observed on minimum dose for M. Uniformity (D-5-D-95) on PTVI resulted 6.6 +/- 1.4% for IMRT and ranged from 5.7 +/- 0.3% to 8.1 +/- 0.8% for RA plans (+/- 1 standard deviation). Conformity index (CI95%) Was 1.3 +/- 0.1 (IMRT) and 1.4 +/- 0.1 (all RA techniques). Bladder: all techniques resulted equivalent above 40 Gy; V-30GY similar to 57% for the double arcs, similar to 61% for RA1 and similar to 65% for IMRT. Femurs: maximum dose was of the order of 41-42 Gy for all RA plans and similar to 45 Gy for IMRT. Small bowel: all techniques respected planning objectives. The number of computed MU/fraction was 1531 +/- 206 (IMRT), 468 95 (RA1), and 545 80 (RA2) leading to differences in treatment time: 9.4 +/- 1.7 min for IMRT vs. 1.1 +/- 0.0 min for RA1 and 2.6 +/- 0.0 min for double arcs. Conclusion: RapidArc showed improvements in organs at risk and healthy tissue sparing with uncompromised target coverage when double arcs are applied. Optimal results were also achieved anyway with IMRT plans. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 92 (2009) 118-124
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 124
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   TomoTherapy: Implications on daily workload and scheduling patients [J].
Bijdekerke, Paul ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Tournel, Koen ;
Vinh-Hung, Vincent ;
Somers, Ferdi ;
Bieseman, Peggy ;
Storme, Guy .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 86 (02) :224-230
[2]   Shortened irradiation scheme, continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and fractionation of mitomycin C in locally advanced anal carcinomas.: Results of a phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.: Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups [J].
Bosset, JF ;
Roelofsen, F ;
Morgan, DAL ;
Budach, V ;
Coucke, P ;
Jager, JJ ;
Van der Steen-Banasik, E ;
Trivière, N ;
Stüben, G ;
Puyraveau, M ;
Mercier, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (01) :45-51
[3]   Clinical implications of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for IMRT treatment planning and verification [J].
Bragg, Christopher M. ;
Wingate, Katrina ;
Conway, John .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 86 (02) :276-284
[4]   Sweeping-window arc therapy: an implementation of rotational IMRT with automatic beam-weight calculation [J].
Cameron, C .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (18) :4317-4336
[5]   Organ sparing by conformal avoidance intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: Dosimetric evaluation of coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes [J].
Chen, YJ ;
Liu, A ;
Tsai, PT ;
Vora, NL ;
Pezner, RD ;
Schultheiss, TE ;
Wong, JYC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (01) :274-281
[6]   DOSE CALCULATION FOR PHOTON BEAMS WITH INTENSITY MODULATION GENERATED BY DYNAMIC JAW OR MULTILEAF COLLIMATIONS [J].
CHUI, CS ;
LOSASSO, T ;
SPIROU, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) :1237-1244
[7]   THE GENERATION OF INTENSITY-MODULATED FIELDS FOR CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY BY DYNAMIC COLLIMATION [J].
CONVERY, DJ ;
ROSENBLOOM, ME .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (06) :1359-1374
[8]   Intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) with centrally blocked rotational fields [J].
Cotrutz, C ;
Kappas, C ;
Webb, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08) :2185-2206
[9]   A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy [J].
Cozzi, Luca ;
Dinshaw, Ketayun Ardeshir ;
Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore ;
Mahantshetty, Umesh ;
Engineer, Reena ;
Deshpande, Deepak Dattatray ;
Jamema, S. V. ;
Vanetti, Eugenio ;
Clivio, Alessandro ;
Nicolini, Giorgia ;
Fogliata, Antonella .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (02) :180-191
[10]   Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): First clinical experience [J].
Duthoy, W ;
De Gersem, W ;
Vergote, K ;
Coghe, M ;
Boterberg, T ;
De Deene, Y ;
De Wagter, C ;
Van Belle, S ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (04) :1019-1032