Comparison of GOES Cloud Classification Algorithms Employing Explicit and Implicit Physics

被引:27
作者
Bankert, Richard L. [1 ]
Mitrescu, Cristian [1 ]
Miller, Steven D. [2 ]
Wade, Robert H. [3 ]
机构
[1] USN, Res Lab, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Cooperat Inst Res Atmosphere, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Monterey, CA USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
SATELLITE-OBSERVATIONS; NEURAL-NETWORK; AVHRR; VIIRS; MODIS; IDENTIFICATION; VALIDATION; RADIOMETER; RETRIEVAL; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1175/2009JAMC2103.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Cloud-type classification based on multispectral satellite imagery data has been widely researched and demonstrated to be useful for distinguishing a variety of classes using a wide range of methods. The research described here is a comparison of the classifier output from two very different algorithms applied to Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) data over the course of one year. The first algorithm employs spectral channel thresholding and additional physically based tests. The second algorithm was developed through a supervised learning method with characteristic features of expertly labeled image samples used as training data for a 1-nearest-neighbor classification. The latter's ability to identify classes is also based in physics, but those relationships are embedded implicitly within the algorithm. A pixel-to-pixel comparison analysis was done for hourly daytime scenes within a region in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Considerable agreement was found in this analysis, with many of the mismatches or disagreements providing insight to the strengths and limitations of each classifier. Depending upon user needs, a rule-based or other postprocessing system that combines the output from the two algorithms could provide the most reliable cloud-type classification.
引用
收藏
页码:1411 / 1421
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Comparison of genetic algorithm systems with neural network and statistical techniques for analysis of cloud structures in midlatitude storm systems [J].
Parikh, JA ;
DaPonte, JS ;
Vitale, JN ;
Tselioudis, G .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 1997, 18 (11-13) :1347-1351
[22]   Daytime global cloud typing from AVHRR and VIIRS: Algorithm description, validation, and comparisons [J].
Pavolonis, MJ ;
Heidinger, AK ;
Uttal, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2005, 44 (06) :804-826
[23]   Daytime cloud overlap detection from AVHRR and VIIRS [J].
Pavolonis, MJ ;
Heidinger, AK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) :762-778
[24]   Monitoring deep convection and convective overshooting with METEOSAT [J].
Schmetz, J ;
Tjemkes, SA ;
Gube, M ;
vandeBerg, L .
SATELLITE DATA APPLICATIONS: WEATHER AND CLIMATE, 1997, 19 (03) :433-441
[25]  
Seemann SW, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P1072, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1072:OROATM>2.0.CO
[26]  
2
[27]  
Tag PM, 2000, J APPL METEOROL, V39, P125, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0125:AAMCTC>2.0.CO
[28]  
2
[29]  
Wang Z, 2001, J APPL METEOROL, V40, P1665, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1665:CTAMPR>2.0.CO
[30]  
2