Cystatin C-based calculation of glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients

被引:77
作者
Poege, U.
Gerhardt, T.
Stoffel-Wagner, B.
Palmedo, H.
Klehr, H. U.
Sauerbruch, T.
Woitas, R. P.
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Internal Med 1, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Dept Clin Biochem, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Nucl Med, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
关键词
cystatin C equation; glomerular filtration rate; renal transplantation; MDRD;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ki.5001502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cystatin C (Cys C) has been shown to be an alternative marker of renal function. However, estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on Cys C has received little attention. Recently, several Cys C-based equations were developed in different patient cohorts. To date, the benefit of a Cys C-based GFR calculation in patients after renal transplantation (RTx) remains to be elucidated. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of three Cys C-based formulae (Larsson, Hoek, Filler which used an immunonephelometric method) with the results of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured by means of technetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Tc-99m-DTPA) clearance in 108 consecutive patients after RTx. Correlation coefficients of all calculated GFR estimates with the true GFR were high but did not differ significantly from one another (0.83-0.87). The MDRD and Filler equations overestimated GFR significantly, whereas the Larsson equation significantly underestimated GFR. Bias of the Hoek formula was negligible. Precision of the Hoek (8.9 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2)) and Larsson equations (9.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) were significantly better than MDRD equations (11.4 ml/min/ 1.73 m(2); P <= 0.035 each). Accuracy within 30% of real GFR was 67.0 and 65.1% for the MDRD and Filler formulae, and 77.1% for the Larsson and Hoek formulae, respectively. Accuracy within 50% of true GFR for the Hoek formula (97.2%) was better than for the MDRD equations (85.3%). Cys C-based formulae may provide a better diagnostic performance than creatinine-based equations in GFR calculation after RTx.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 210
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL
[2]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[3]  
Bökenkamp A, 1999, CLIN CHEM, V45, P1866
[4]  
Bökenkamp A, 2002, CLIN CHEM, V48, P1123
[5]   Serum cystatin C, a potent inhibitor of cysteine proteinases, is elevated in asthmatic patients [J].
Cimerman, N ;
Brguljan, PM ;
Krasovec, M ;
Suskovic, S ;
Kos, J .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2000, 300 (1-2) :83-95
[6]   Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A meta-analysis [J].
Dharnidharka, VR ;
Kwon, C ;
Stevens, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 40 (02) :221-226
[7]  
DUBOIS D, 1989, NUTRITION, V5, P303
[8]   K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification - Foreword [J].
Eknoyan, G ;
Levin, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (02) :S14-S266
[9]   Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? [J].
Filler, G ;
Lepage, N .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 18 (10) :981-985
[10]   Performance of different prediction equations for estimating renal function in kidney transplantation [J].
Gaspari, F ;
Ferrari, S ;
Stucchi, N ;
Centemeri, E ;
Carrara, F ;
Pellegrino, M ;
Gherardi, G ;
Gotti, E ;
Segoloni, G ;
Salvadori, M ;
Rigotti, P ;
Valente, U ;
Donati, D ;
Sandrini, S ;
Sparacino, V ;
Remuzzi, G ;
Perico, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) :1826-1835