Land Ecological Security Evaluation of Guangzhou, China

被引:50
作者
Xu, Linyu [1 ]
Yin, Hao [1 ]
Li, Zhaoxue [1 ]
Li, Shun [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Environm Protect, Environm Informat Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Guangzhou; land ecological security; LES supply and demand; material security; spiritual security; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOOTPRINT; LANDSCAPE; MODEL; SCIENCE; PATTERN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph111010537
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
As the land ecosystem provides the necessary basic material resources for human development, land ecological security (LES) plays an increasingly important role in sustainable development. Given the degradation of land ecological security under rapid urbanization and the urgent LES requirements of urban populations, a comprehensive evaluation method, named Double Land Ecological Security (DLES), has been introduced with the city of Guangzhou, China, as a case study, which evaluates the LES in regional and unit scales for reasonable and specific urban planning. In the evaluation process with this method, we have combined the material security with the spiritual security that is inevitably associated with LES. Some new coefficients of land-security supply/demand distribution and technology contribution for LES evaluation have also been introduced for different spatial scales, including the regional and the unit scales. The results for Guangzhou indicated that, temporally, the LES supply indices were 0.77, 0.84 and 0.77 in 2000, 2006 and 2009 respectively, while LES demand indices for the city increased in 2000, 2006 and 2009 from 0.57 to 0.95, which made the LES level decreased slowly in this period. Spatially, at the regional scale, the urban land ecological security (ULES) level decreased from 0.2 (marginal security) to -0.18 (marginal insecurity) as a whole; in unit scale, areas in the north and in parts of the east were relatively secure and the security area was shrinking with time, but the central and southern areas turned to be marginal insecurity, especially in 2006 and 2009. This study proposes that DLES evaluation should be conducted for targeted and efficient urban planning and management, which can reflect the LES level of study area in general and in detail.
引用
收藏
页码:10537 / 10558
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]
Irreversible ecosystem change, species competition, and shifting cultivation [J].
Albers, HJ ;
Goldbach, MJ .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2000, 22 (03) :261-280
[2]
Proxy global assessment of land degradation [J].
Bai, Z. G. ;
Dent, D. L. ;
Olsson, L. ;
Schaepman, M. E. .
SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 24 (03) :223-234
[3]
Analysis of landscape pattern: towards a 'top down' indicator for evaluation of landuse [J].
Bartel, A .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 130 (1-3) :87-94
[4]
Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security [J].
Bommarco, Riccardo ;
Kleijn, David ;
Potts, Simon G. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2013, 28 (04) :230-238
[5]
China Statistics Bureau, 2007, GUANGZH STAT YB 2007
[6]
China Statistics Bureau, 2001, GUANGZH STAT YB 2001
[7]
China Statistics Bureau, 2010, GUANGZH STAT YB 2010
[8]
The effects of land tenure change on sustainability: human security and environmental change in southern African savannas [J].
Clover, J. ;
Eriksen, S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2009, 12 (01) :53-70
[9]
The environmental impacts of consumption at a subnational level - The ecological footprint of Cardiff [J].
Collins, Andrea ;
Flynn, Andrew ;
Wiedrnann, Thomas ;
Barrett, John .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 10 (03) :9-24