Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy

被引:44
作者
Chan, Wah-Kheong [1 ]
Azmi, Najib [2 ]
Mahadeva, Sanjiv [1 ]
Goh, Khean-Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Islamic Sci Univ Malaysia, Fac Med, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
关键词
Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Split-dose; Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution; BOWEL-PREPARATION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY; IMPACT; TRIAL; ASIA;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
AIM: To compare same-day whole-dose vs split-dose of 2-litre polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus bisacodyl for colon cleansing for morning colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing morning colonoscopy were allocated into two groups i.e., same-day whole-dose or split-dose of 2-litre PEG-ELS. Investigators and endoscopists were blinded to the allocation. All patients completed a questionnaire that was designed by Aronchick and colleagues to assess the tolerability of the bowel preparation regime used. In addition, patients answered an ordinal five-value Likert scale question on comfort level during bowel preparation. Endoscopists graded the quality of bowel preparation using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS). In addition, endoscopists gave an overall grading of the quality of bowel preparation. Cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total colonoscopy time, adenoma detection rate and number of adenomas detected for each patient were recorded. Sample size was calculated using an online calculator for binary outcome non-inferiority trial. Analyses was based upon intent-to-treat. Significance was assumed at P-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Data for 295 patients were analysed. Mean age was 62.0 +/- 14.4 years old and consisted of 50.2 % male. There were 143 and 152 patients in the split-dose and whole-dose group, respectively. Split-dose was as good as whole-dose for quality of bowel preparation. The total BBPS score was as good in the split-dose group compared to the whole-dose group [6 (6-8) vs 6 (6-7), P = 0.038]. There was no difference in cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total colonoscopy time and adenoma detection rate. Median number of adenoma detected was marginally higher in the split-dose group [2 (1-3) vs 1 (1-2), P = 0.010]. Patients in the whole-dose group had more nausea (37.5% vs 25.2%, P = 0.023) and vomiting (16.4% vs 8.4%, P = 0.037), and were less likely to complete the bowel preparation (94.1% vs 99.3%, P = 0.020). Patients in the split-dose group were less likely to refuse the same bowel preparation regime (6.3% vs 13.8%, P = 0.033) and less likely to want to try another bowel preparation regime (53.8% vs 78.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Splitting reduced-volume PEG-ELS for morning colonoscopy is as effective as taking the whole dose on the same morning but is better tolerated and preferred by patients. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14488 / 14494
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Aoun, E ;
Abdul-Baki, H ;
Azar, C ;
Mourad, F ;
Barada, K ;
Berro, Z ;
Tarchichi, M ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) :213-218
[2]
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[3]
Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives [J].
Burke, Carol A. ;
Church, James M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (03) :565-573
[4]
Chan T H, 2006, Chin J Dig Dis, V7, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00240.x
[5]
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction of an Outpatient Colonoscopy Service in an Asian Tertiary Care Hospital [J].
Chan, Wah-Kheong ;
Goh, Khean-Lee .
GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 2012
[6]
Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy [J].
Chan, Wah-Kheong ;
Saravanan, Arjunan ;
Manikam, Jeeta ;
Goh, Khean-Lee ;
Mahadeva, Sanjiv .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 11
[7]
The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms - A prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial [J].
Chiu, Han-Mo ;
Lin, Jaw-Town ;
Wang, Hsiu-Po ;
Lee, Yi-Chia ;
Wu, Ming-Shiang .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (12) :2719-2725
[8]
Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - Timing is the key! [J].
Church, JM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (10) :1223-1225
[9]
Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Wolff, BG ;
Meagher, A ;
Cleveland, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (10) :2187-2191
[10]
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384