A multicenter trial of a footdrop stimulator controlled by a tilt sensor

被引:88
作者
Stein, Richard B. [1 ]
Chong, SuLing
Everaert, Dirk G.
Rolf, Robert
Thompson, Aiko K.
Whittaker, Maura
Robertson, Jenny
Fung, Joyce
Preuss, Richard
Momose, Kimito
Ihashi, Kouji
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Ctr Neurosci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Physiol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
[3] GF Strong Rehabil Ctr, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Yamagata Prefectural Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Yamagata, Japan
关键词
functional electrical stimulation; footdrop; multicenter trial; stroke; spinal cord injury;
D O I
10.1177/1545968306289292
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. To test the efficacy and acceptance of a footdrop stimulator controlled by a tilt sensor. Methods. A nonrandomized, test-retest study of 26 subjects with footdrop of more than I year's duration, resulting from various central nervous system disorders, was performed in 4 centers for at least 3 months. Speed of walking in a straight line, speed around a figure of 8, and physiological cost index (PCI) were measured with and without the device. Hours/day and steps/day using the device were recorded. Results. All but 2 subjects used the tilt sensor at home, rather than a foot switch. Walking speed increased by 15% after 3 months (n = 26; P < 0.01), 32% after 6 months (n = 16; P < 0.01), and 47% after 12 months (n = 8; P < 0.05), while PCI decreased. The number of steps taken per day of use increased significantly over time, and increased speed was directly correlated with usage. Walking speed also increased with the stimulator off, but to a lesser extent, indicating a training effect. Subject feedback from a questionnaire indicated satisfaction with the stimulator. Conclusions. Both efficacy and acceptance of the stimulator were good in a population of subjects with chronic footdrop.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 379
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Electrical stimulation for modulation of spasticity in hemiplegic and spinal cord injury subjects [J].
Alfieri, V .
NEUROMODULATION, 2001, 4 (02) :85-92
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, PHYSIOTHERAPY, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)65582-4
[3]
Experience of clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator [J].
Burridge, J ;
Taylor, P ;
Hagan, S ;
Swain, I .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1997, 21 (03) :254-260
[4]
Dai R, 1996, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, V4, P63, DOI 10.1109/86.506403
[5]
Effects of a simple functional electric system and/or a hinged ankle-foot orthosis on walking in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury [J].
Kim, CM ;
Eng, JJ ;
Whittaker, MW .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (10) :1718-1723
[6]
The sensitivity and selectivity of an implantable two-channel peroneal nerve stimulator system for restoration of dropped foot [J].
Kottink, AIR ;
Buschman, HPJ ;
Kenney, LPJ ;
Veltink, PH ;
Slycke, P ;
Bultstra, G ;
Hermens, HJ .
NEUROMODULATION, 2004, 7 (04) :277-283
[7]
KRALJ A, 1993, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V17, P107
[8]
LIBERSON W T, 1961, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, V42, P101
[9]
A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot [J].
Lyons, GM ;
Sinkjær, T ;
Burridge, JH ;
Wilcox, DJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2002, 10 (04) :260-279
[10]
MacGregor J, 1981, Physiotherapy, V67, P30