Elapsed time for capsular apposition to intraocular lens after cataract surgery

Objective: To examine when the anterior and posterior lens capsule completely become apposed to optics of silicone and acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted after cataract surgery and to determine whether the different IOL materials influence the timing of completion of capsular contact. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who were scheduled to undergo cataract surgery were randomly assigned to two groups using random number tables based on the type of IOL implanted: silicone or acrylic. Thirty-two patients in each group completed the follow-up. Intervention: All eyes underwent phacoemulsification surgery with implantation of either a silicone or acrylic IOL. All IOLs were accurately placed into the capsular bag. Main Outcome Measures: Contact of the anterior and posterior lens capsule with the IOL optic surface was evaluated using the Scheimpflug videophotography system at 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery. The postoperative day at which each capsule was completely apposed to the IOL optic was determined. In addition, anterior chamber depth was also measured. Results: The anterior capsule was in contact with the IOL optic on the same day or earlier than the posterior capsule in all patients. Complete apposition of the IOL was observed significantly earlier with silicone IOLs than with acrylic IOLs with both the anterior capsule (6.2 versus 3.6 postoperative days; P < 0.0001) and the posterior capsule (11.1 versus 7.4 postoperative days; P = 0.0339). No significant change in mean anterior chamber depth was observed with the silicone IOL, whereas there was significant anterior shift after implantation of the acrylic IOL. Conclusions: Capsular contact with the IOL optic is completed within approximately 8 days after cataract surgery with silicone IOLs and 11 days with acrylic IOLs. Complete apposition to both the anterior and posterior capsule was significantly earlier with silicone IOLs than with acrylic IOLs. (C) 2002 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.