Evaluation of focal liver lesions: fast-recovery fast spin echo T2-weighted MR imaging

被引:9
作者
Akin, Oguz
Schwartz, Lawrence H.
Welber, Adam
Maier, Cynthia F.
DeCorato, Douglas R.
Panicek, David M.
机构
[1] Mem SloanKettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Danbury Hosp, Danbury, CT 06810 USA
[3] GE Med Syst, Waukesha, WI 53201 USA
[4] E River Med Imaging, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
fast-recovery fast spin echo; liver lesion; MR imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2006.02.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin echo (FR-FSE) and non-breath-hold fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted sequences for hepatic lesion conspicuity and image quality at MR imaging. Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine patients with known or suspected liver lesions underwent hepatic MR imaging by using a breath-hold FR-FSE T2-weighted sequence with and without fat suppression and a non-breath-hold FSE T2-weighted sequence with and without fat suppression. Quantitative analysis was made with measurements of the signal intensity of the liver, spleen, background noise, and up to three liver lesions, as well as calculations of the liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the liver-to-lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each sequence. Qualitative analysis was made for image quality and the number of lesions identified. Statistical analysis was performed by using a single-tailed paired Student's t test with a 95% confidence interval. Results: SNR and CNR were significantly higher (P < .05) for FSE with fat suppression than for FR-FSE with fat suppression. No statistically significant difference was seen in terms of SNR and CNR between non-fat-suppressed FSE and FR-FSE sequences. Lesion conspicuity, liver edge sharpness, and clarity of vessels were superior and ghosting was less with the FR-FSE sequences compared with the FSE sequences. Conclusion: Breath-hold FR-FSE technique is a reasonable alternative in T2-weighted imaging of the liver. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 325
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Liver: T2-weighted MR imaging with breath-hold fast-recovery optimized fast spin-echo compared with breath-hold half-Fourier and non-breath-hold respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo pulse sequences [J].
Augui, J ;
Vignaux, O ;
Argaud, C ;
Coste, J ;
Gouya, H ;
Legmann, P .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (03) :853-859
[2]   Utility of breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin-echo T2 versus respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo T2 in clinical hepatic imaging [J].
Huang, J ;
Raman, SS ;
Vuong, N ;
Sayre, JW ;
Lu, DSK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (03) :842-846
[3]   Focal hepatic lesion detection: Comparison of four fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR imaging pulse sequences [J].
Kanematsu, M ;
Hoshi, H ;
Itoh, K ;
Murakami, T ;
Hori, M ;
Kondo, H ;
Yokoyama, R ;
Nakamura, H .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (02) :363-371
[4]   Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI of the liver: Comparison of respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo, breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo, and breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin-echo sequences [J].
Katayama, M ;
Masui, T ;
Kobayashi, S ;
Ito, T ;
Takahashi, M ;
Sakahara, H ;
Nozaki, A ;
Kabasawa, H .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 14 (04) :439-449
[5]   COMPARISON OF BREATH-HOLD FAST SPIN-ECHO AND CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO PULSE SEQUENCES FOR T2-WEIGHTED MR-IMAGING OF LIVER-LESIONS [J].
RYDBERG, JN ;
LOMAS, DJ ;
COAKLEY, KJ ;
HOUGH, DM ;
EHMAN, RL ;
RIEDERER, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (02) :431-437
[6]  
Schwartz LH, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V217, P586
[7]   T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: Breath-hold fast spin-echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression [J].
Soyer, P ;
LeNormand, S ;
deGivry, SC ;
Gueye, C ;
Somveille, E ;
Scherrer, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (03) :593-597
[8]   Phased array breath-hold versus non-breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: A prospective comparative study [J].
Yamashita, Y ;
Yamamoto, H ;
Namimoto, T ;
Abe, Y ;
Takahashi, M .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (02) :292-297