Colorectal hepatic metastases: quantitative measurements using single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging

被引:100
作者
Koh, D. M.
Scurr, E.
Collins, D. J.
Pirgon, A.
Kanber, B.
Karanjia, N.
Brown, G.
Leach, M. O.
Husband, J. E.
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Acad Dept Radiol, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, Canc Res Uk Magnet Resonance Clin Res Grp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[3] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Dept Surg, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
colorectal; diffusion MR imaging; metastasis;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-006-0201-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to obtain quantitative measurements of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC1), flow insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC2) and perfusion fraction ( F) of colorectal hepatic metastases using DWI and to compare these measurements with those obtained in liver parenchyma. Forty patients with 66 hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma were prospectively evaluated using DWI with three b values. Quantitative maps of the ADC1 ( using b= 0, 150, 500 s/mm(2)images), ADC2 ( using b= 150, 500 s/mm(2) images) and fractional variation ( F) between ADC1 and ADC2, which reflects perfusion fraction, were calculated. The ADC1, ADC2 and F derived from metastases and liver parenchyma were compared. The mean ADC1 values of liver parenchyma and metastases were significantly higher than the mean ADC2 values ( P< 0.0001, paired t-test). Colorectal metastases were found to have higher mean ADC1 and ADC2 values compared with liver ( P< 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). However, the estimated F was found to be lower in metastases compared to liver (P= 0.03, Mann-Whitney test). Colorectal hepatic metastases were characterised by higher ADC1 and ADC2 values, but lower F values compared to liver.
引用
收藏
页码:1898 / 1905
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   In vivo monitoring of apoptosis [J].
Brauer, M .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 27 (02) :323-331
[2]   Developing a quality control protocol for diffusion imaging on a clinical MRI system [J].
Delakis, I ;
Moore, EM ;
Leach, MO ;
De Wilde, JP .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (08) :1409-1422
[3]   Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions [J].
Ichikawa, T ;
Haradome, H ;
Hachiya, J ;
Nitatori, T ;
Araki, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) :397-402
[4]   MR imaging of the liver: techniques and clinical applications [J].
Ito, K ;
Mitchell, DG ;
Matsunaga, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 32 (01) :2-14
[5]   Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease [J].
Kim, T ;
Murakami, T ;
Takahashi, S ;
Hori, M ;
Tsuda, K ;
Nakamura, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (02) :393-398
[6]   Detection of liver metastases: gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced three-dimensional dynamic phases and one-hour delayed phase MR imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Kim, YK ;
Lee, JM ;
Kim, CS ;
Chung, GH ;
Kim, CY ;
Kim, IH .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (02) :220-228
[7]   SEPARATION OF DIFFUSION AND PERFUSION IN INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION MR IMAGING [J].
LEBIHAN, D ;
BRETON, E ;
LALLEMAND, D ;
AUBIN, ML ;
VIGNAUD, J ;
LAVALJEANTET, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (02) :497-505
[8]  
MULLER MF, 1994, RADIOLOGY, V190, P475
[9]   Abdomen:: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pulse-triggered single-shot sequences [J].
Mürtz, P ;
Flacke, S ;
Träber, F ;
van den Brink, JS ;
Gieseke, J ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :258-264
[10]   Focal liver masses: Characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging [J].
Namimoto, T ;
Yamashita, Y ;
Sumi, S ;
Tang, Y ;
Takahashi, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (03) :739-744