Better prediction of prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using primary tumor volume

被引:93
作者
Chen, MK
Chen, THH
Liu, JP
Chang, CC
Chie, WC
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Grad Inst Prevent Med, Taipei 10020, Taiwan
[2] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei 10020, Taiwan
[5] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Stat, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC); primary tumor volume; TNM stage; survival;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.20210
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Heterogeneity of primary tumor volume within tumors of the same classification indicates a need to elucidate the effects of primary tumor volume on treatment outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS. From 1994 through 1996, 129 patients with newly diagnosed NPC who were treated with high-dose radiotherapy were enrolled in the study. Computed tomography-derived primary tumor volume was measured using the summation-of-area technique. Correlations between American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) disease stage, primary tumor volume, and disease-specific survival were assessed using a Cox regression model. Cross-validation based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve also was examined. RESULTS. Compared with the AJCC staging system and the TNM classification system, primary tumor volume was better at determining cumulative survival for patients with NPC. Hazard ratios increased with tumor volume, ranging from 6.68 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.89-23.67) for tumor volumes between 20-40 mL, 18.03 (95% CI, 4.80-67.75) for tumor volumes between 40-60 mL, and 26.06 (95% Cl, 7.70-88.20) for tumor Volumes > 60 mL. With both tumor volume and T classification in the same Cox regression model, only tumor volume remained statistically significant in the prognosis of NPC. The validation results with ROC curves also revealed that, in predicting patient outcome, primary tumor volume (area under the ROC = 83.33%) was superior to disease stage (area under the ROC = 66.53%) and TNM classification (area under the ROC = 58.61%), CONCLUSIONS. The incorporation of primary tumor volume may lead to a further refinement of the current AJCC staging system, particularly for patients with large primary tumor volumes (> 60 mL), who require more aggressive treatment. (C) 2004 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2160 / 2166
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Laryngeal tumor volume measurements determined with CT: A study on intra- and interobserver variability [J].
Hermans, R ;
Feron, M ;
Bellon, E ;
Dupont, P ;
Van den Bogaert, W ;
Baert, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (03) :553-557
[12]  
HO JHC, 1978, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V4, P182
[13]   THE TUMOR VOLUME AND CLONOGEN NUMBER RELATIONSHIP - TUMOR-CONTROL PREDICTIONS BASED UPON TUMOR VOLUME ESTIMATES DERIVED FROM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
JOHNSON, CR ;
THAMES, HD ;
HUANG, DT ;
SCHMIDTULLRICH, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (02) :281-287
[14]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An update of the UCSF experience [J].
Lee, N ;
Xia, P ;
Quivey, JM ;
Sultanem, K ;
Poon, I ;
Akazawa, C ;
Akazawa, PM ;
Weinberg, V ;
Fu, KK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (01) :12-22
[15]  
LEE WR, 1993, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V25, P683
[16]  
MAYR NA, 1996, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V35, P925
[17]  
MULLERSCHIMPFLE M, 1992, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V16, P110, DOI 10.1097/00004728-199201000-00021
[18]  
Pameijer FA, 1997, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V19, P6, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199701)19:1<6::AID-HED2>3.3.CO
[19]  
2-U
[20]   The potential impact of CT-MRI matching on tumor volume delineation in advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Rasch, C ;
Keus, R ;
Pameijer, FA ;
Koops, W ;
deRu, V ;
Muller, S ;
Touw, A ;
Bartelink, H ;
vanHerk, M ;
Lebesque, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :841-848