Cut scores and testing: Statistics, judgment, truth, and error

被引:49
作者
Dwyer, CA
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.360
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The uses and abuses of cut scores (also called cut points, or standards) are examined, illustrating their typical applications and ubiquity. The article demonstrates that cut scores (a) always entail judgment; (b) inherently result in misclassification; (c) impose an artificial dichotomy on an essentially continuous distribution of knowledge, skill or ability; and that (d) no ''true'' cut scores exist. Issues involved in minimizing abuses of cut scores are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 362
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW, SOMETHING BORROWED, A LOT TO DO [J].
BERK, RA .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1995, 8 (01) :99-109
[2]  
BERK RA, 1994, JOINT C STAND SETT L
[3]  
BUCK LS, 1977, GUIDE SETTING APPROP
[4]  
Ebel R., 1979, ESSENTIALS ED MEASUR
[5]   STANDARDS AND CRITERIA [J].
GLASS, GV .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1978, 15 (04) :237-261
[6]   QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY [J].
LAWSHE, CH .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 28 (04) :563-575
[7]   AN INTEGRATION AND REPRISE - WHAT WE THINK WE HAVE LEARNED [J].
PLAKE, BS .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1995, 8 (01) :85-92
[8]  
Shepard L. A., 1979, PRACTICES PROBLEMS C, P72
[9]  
van der Linden W. J., 1981, APPLIED PSYCHOL MEAS, V4, P469
[10]  
Yankelovich D., 1991, COMING PUBLIC JUDGME, V1st